Laserfiche WebLink
Capital Improvement Program Memo <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />need to say that I do not have any realistic idea about the cost of this type of <br />space or if the cost can be kept "low" give the kitchen component of the facility. <br /> <br />Funding...On the other hand, if the project gets larger or more substantial <br />and gets more expensive, then funding becomes a major consideration. When <br />considering funding for a more substantial facility, you are virtually assuring <br />yourself of a public referendum and the earliest this would happen is the <br />November 2002 election. If the council is going to consider a request for a 1/~ <br />cent sales tax to pay for this facility, then approval of the proposal is needed by <br />the state legislature and then the request has to go before the voters for <br />approval. Accordingly, regardless if it is a sales tax proposal or a property tax <br />proposal, a public referendum would be needed. For a sales tax proposal it <br />would be best to get legislative approval in 2001 so that fifteen months or so <br />could be spent in promoting the issue and preparing the public for the vote. If <br />approval was given by the legislature in the 2002 session, then there would be <br />only a few months to work on the project before the November election. <br />Finally, in order to get a proposal passed by the legislature in 2001, work <br />would need to be done immediately as any proposal would take at least twelve <br />months or so to prepare. <br /> <br />The above sequence of activities outlines the timing problem for a sales tax <br />proposal. A straight property tax bond referendum proposal is better from a <br />timing point of view, but may not have as good of a chance of being successful. <br /> <br />If the city is going to pursue a shared facility, then a great deal of work needs <br />to be done by both the city and school district. One of the issues is the design of <br />this large facility. Following agreement on the design and components of the <br />facility, management would have to be discussed in terms of who is going to <br />own the facility, be the fiscal agent for the operating expenses, establish the <br />hours of operation, and things of this nature. Accurately dividing up the <br />capital expenses for a shared facility and the operating expenses for a shared <br />facility will be another challenging task. The location of a joint facility is one <br />more concern that has to be addressed. Additionally, discussion should take <br />place as to whether or not there are any real savings to either the city or the <br />school in either capital or operating expenses by doing a shared facility and <br />whether or not having all of these facilities at one location under one roof with <br />one parking lot is appropriate or if it may ultimately be more appropriate to <br />have the facilities at different locations and dispersed throughout the <br />community. <br /> <br />As you can tell, from my point of view a "substantial" community center done <br />jointly with the school will be a big challenge, but as previously noted, it <br /> <br /> <br />