Laserfiche WebLink
larrigivie am:1 0 <br /> Position Statement <br /> The EPA Clean Power Plan — <br /> Minnesota Needs Major Changes in the Final Rule <br /> The electric utility industry is suddenly facing more <br /> /7--- - <br /> than a dozen environmental regulations over the next <br /> few years on a host of issues, including air pollutants, <br /> greenhouse gases, water, and coal combustion residuals. <br /> Several regulatory programs could transform the <br /> entire electricity industry,causing major concerns over <br /> reliability of the grid and possible significant increases <br /> / <br /> in consumer rates.The most problematic regulatory ii effort for Minnesota is EPA's Clean Power Plan, a <br /> major undertaking that seeks significant nationwide / <br /> reductions in carbon dioxide emissions from existing <br /> power plants. r` <br /> / <br /> f <br /> On June 18, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection r ' <br /> Agency(EPA)published a proposed rule known as the <br /> Clean Power Plan(CPP).The CPP would establish r <br /> emission guidelines for existing electric generating units t <br /> (EGUs)under section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act(CAA). <br /> EPA is expected to issue the final version of the CPP <br /> in mid-summer 2015.MMUA filed extensive comments <br /> on the proposed rule.The final rule will likely contain ' <br /> significant changes and clarifications. a=/, <br /> Legal Issues <br /> The CPP is very different from clean air regulations <br /> developed by EPA in the past. It is subject to numerous <br /> legal challenges and is probably more susceptible to ,' <br /> being overturned than most new regulations. A. <br /> Section 111(d)of the CAA is intended to regulate f <br /> stationary sources of air pollution,but the CPP doesn't <br /> regulate individual sources, such as power plants. It <br /> regulates states.The law intends that states develop ! / <br /> plans which establish standards of performance for 1j,it <br /> power plants. But the CPP turns this process on its head <br /> and makes states the regulated entities rather than the The CapX2020 transmission lines will serve Minnesota's <br /> regulators that the law intends them to be. expected growth and help begin to meet Minnesota's <br /> Of the nearly 100 New Source Performance Standards Renewable Energy Standard (RES). The Brookings County <br /> (NSPS) and emission guidelines EPA has developed Hampton 345 kV line (pictured) will expand access to <br /> wind resources by adding about 700 MW of capacity to the <br /> since 1970,every one has been based on a"system of transmission grid.This line,along with other projects recently <br /> emission reduction"that is incorporated into the design completed or currently under construction or in the planning <br /> or operation of individual sources.The CPP instead stages, has the potential to add nearly 2,000 MW of wind <br /> uses a series of"building blocks"that go well beyond the capacity to the transmission grid. It's estimated Minnesota <br /> operational characteristics of the power plant that is needs about 5,000 MW of renewable energy to meet the RES, <br /> the source of the CO2 emissions that the EPA wants to one of the nation's most aggressive renewable energy laws. <br /> reduce. Unfortunately, early actions to reduce greenhouse gases are <br /> not recognized under the Clean Power Plan as proposed. <br /> The EPA would replace the Federal Energy Regulatory <br /> Commission and the states to become the primary <br /> 2015 Federal Position Statements/3 <br />