My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.0. PRSR 01-06-1993
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
1993-2000
>
1993
>
01-06-1993
>
8.0. PRSR 01-06-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2015 9:14:10 AM
Creation date
3/11/2015 9:13:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRSR
date
1/6/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CREDIT C C IT ON PARK FEES FOR LAND DEDICATED <br /> Issue <br /> Should the land dedicated for this trail system reduce the <br /> amount of park dedication fees paid and if so, by what <br /> amount? Staff recommends the acreage of the land <br /> dedicated for the trail be multiplied by the raw land <br /> value per acre and credited against the total park <br /> dedication fees owed to the City. This assumes the trail <br /> is located within the boundaries of this plat. <br /> D. IMPROVEMENT OF TRAIL <br /> Issue <br /> Should this trail be upgraded now? If this trail is <br /> upgraded now it will lead to private property; currently <br /> there is no area wide park along the Mississippi River. <br /> If it is left unimproved, future homeowners may have the <br /> perception that the trail is infringing on them when it is <br /> constructed. Staff feels the Park and Recreation <br /> Commission should consider having the trail grading <br /> accomplished with the rest of the plat grading, leaving <br /> • the bituminous surface until the park along the <br /> Mississippi is established. <br /> E. TYPE OF TRAIL <br /> This trail is considered a primary loop. <br /> Issue <br /> Should this trail be for pedestrians and bicyclists, how <br /> wide should it be or should there be 2 separate trails? <br /> F. MAINTENANCE <br /> Issue <br /> Should the City maintain this trail? It is conceivable <br /> that an association agreement could be required through <br /> the platting process for the maintenance of this trail. <br /> Staff feels that this is a City wide trail for public use <br /> and that the City should maintain it. The issue of year <br /> round maintenance should also be considered. <br /> G. SUMMARY <br /> 111 Some of the issues raised in this memo go beyond what your <br /> recommendation on the plat should cover, however, they <br /> need to be considered to make sound decisions. There may <br /> also be other issues not mentioned in this memo. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.