Laserfiche WebLink
DMDML( <br /> I,,,,,u v <br /> Legitimate Savings <br /> The current program does not recognize much of the is i <br /> legitimate energy savings that do or could occur from s, <br /> utility efforts. <br /> Life-of-measure savings : a* .`° . <br /> Energy savings from adopting most energy efficiency --! « <br /> technologies continue to accrue over the useful life of ** <br /> the measure. But the CIP law recognizes the energy !! "t" i .it _ , ,^� <br /> savings of a given measure only in the year in which it A _„ <br /> is installed or adopted. For measures with useful lives of '' No 1 <br /> more than one year, the energy savings accruing during ! �'' <br /> those years should be counted towards savings goals. i - E <br /> The proposed federal Clean Power Plan would count ..,,...�- <br /> energy savings from the first ten years of the life of an , • -_ , r- z- <br /> improvement measure. It may make sense for Minnesota <br /> to plan for a state approach that conforms with the r <br /> federal standard. Delano Municipal Utilities went door-to-door with its <br /> conservation improvement program,and enlisted high school <br /> System improvements students in the effort. <br /> Current law credits utilities for doing utility system <br /> efficiency improvements only after they meet a 1 percent conscious decisions to customers.These educational <br /> savings goal based strictly on efficiency measures taken efforts are among the most effective means of creating <br /> by customers. System efficiency improvements are just energy savings, but they are hard to quantify and are <br /> as important and effective as customer programs, and not recognized under the CIP program. If the program <br /> are often a more cost effective means of saving energy. could recognize these savings, utilities would have <br /> The provision that precludes utilities from receiving an incentive to place a higher emphasis on consumer <br /> credit for system improvements unless they have education, which is critical to achieving long-term <br /> achieved 1 percent savings through customer efficiency changes in energy usage patterns.The energy education <br /> measures should be eliminated. efforts of public power communities should be given <br /> credit for energy savings deemed to have occurred as <br /> Educational Efforts result of consumer education efforts. If savings credits <br /> Much of the potential energy savings from utility efforts are not acceptable, the Department of Commerce should <br /> could come from the changing behaviors of customers. be required to run a state-wide education program from <br /> Utilities cannot make those changes happen without the proceeds already assessed to utilities <br /> communicating the benefits of making energy- <br /> 9 <br /> t <br /> C v. <br /> K. 0 (4 <br /> It <br /> 0 <br /> Preston Public Utilities wanted to replace every <br /> incandescent bulb in the city with a compact Municipal utilities are both energy suppliers,and customers. Efforts to cut <br /> fluorescent.So it,along with SMMPA staff,delivered their own use,through initiatives like efficient municipal street lighting,need <br /> the bulbs personally to each home and business. to be acknowledged in a well-rounded conservation program. <br /> 2015 State Position Statements/9 <br />