Laserfiche WebLink
ADMDMIL(l <br /> riffiririvjg Position Statement <br /> Refundable City Sales Tax Exemption <br /> Background ! <br /> In 2013, the Minnesota Legislature enacted an <br /> exemption of the sales tax on some purchases made by <br /> local governments.The administration of this sales tax <br /> exemption proved difficult for both the Department of <br /> Revenue and local governments alike, so in 2014, the <br /> Legislature provided additional clarification as to the i tix airlu hi&Mari purchases and political subdivisions eligible for the to T' <br /> sales tax exemption. However, there remains in effect s gg <br /> a Department of Revenue rule that makes it extremely p _.,.. <br /> difficult for local governments to receive the sales <br /> tax exemption for materials related to a construction <br /> project by not allowing purchases made by the local «...- <br /> government's contractor to be eligible. Municipal projects,like public libraries,benefit the common good. <br /> In practice, this is difficult to manage, as traditional MMUA Position <br /> bidding for construction projects include all labor, MMUA supports efforts to simplify the process to <br /> materials, and equipment needed. The Department of <br /> Revenue rule does allow the sales tax exemption for receive the local government sales tax exemption for <br /> construction material purchased by local governments, construction materials. Statute should be amended <br /> provided the construction contract is for labor only and to allow cities to report sales taxes paid and then to <br /> the local government bears all ownership and liability for receive a refund from the Department of Revenue. This <br /> the materials. The rule also permits a local government would permit cities to use the traditional contracting <br /> to designate a contractor as a"purchasing agent" in process and avoid the added expense and inconvenience <br /> a contract, and thus receive the sales tax exemption of breaking apart construction contracts and assuming <br /> on the condition that all vendors are notified of this liability for materials. MMUA would also support <br /> arrangement, the title of all materials is transferred to making all goods and services purchased by local <br /> the local government, and the local government assumes governments eligible for the sales tax exemption. <br /> all liability for the materials.Along with being time <br /> consuming and difficult to understand, the separate k <br /> purchase of materials or use of a purchasing agent ends 4 <br /> up being costly to cities(storage, insurance, etc.).As <br /> MMUA member cities consider upgrades to wastewater <br /> treatment facilities or water utilities—projects with ` <br /> significant capital costs—receiving the sales tax r , <br /> exemption for materials would help defray the cost to <br /> municipal property taxpayers and rate payers. <br /> M <br /> . . ...." - <br /> -_ .- <br /> A <br /> a r <br /> Street projects often include replacement of underground sewer <br /> and water facilities. Water supply goes hand-in-hand with municipal electric service. <br /> 2015 State Position Statements/11 <br />