Laserfiche WebLink
DEC. 11.1998 5:~SPM MPCA WOD MAxWA SECT MO.B88 P.~x5 <br /> <br />DEPARTMENT: <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />FROM <br /> <br /> PHONE: <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY <br /> <br />December 10, 1998 <br /> <br />Interested Pal~y <br />Peder Larson/~ <br />Commissioner <br /> <br />296-7301 <br /> <br />Star Tribune Inve~tigt~ti.ve Report mt the MPCA <br /> <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />Office Memorandum <br /> <br />The Minnesota Polhtion Control Agency has been the subject of an investigative inquiry by the <br />Star Tribune Newspaper since May 1998, While many lines of inquiry have been followed, the <br />target now appears to be the state's effective regulation and enforcement of federal and state <br />wastewater treatment permits among major Minnesota cities and industries. Because we lmve <br />reason to believe that the out:omc of this inquiry will be published soon, we wanted to take this <br />opportunity to share with you the points we have attempted to make about our water quality <br />program. <br /> <br />!na_~propri~te Use of the EPA Database <br />The Star Tribune plans to use an Environmental Protection Agency's database to show trends in <br />environmental performance of the state's major wastewater treatment facilities, We and EPA <br />have tried to point out the problems inherent in using the database for this purpose. Through <br />extensive research we've determined that the system's inflexibility and limited capabilities lead <br />to reporting errors showing false violations. Problems with data entry also cause inaccuracies in <br />the data reported from the system. We've suggested flint better measures of performance are <br />water quality indicators, the development of which is an important focus of the agency. <br /> <br />Comp. liance Rate of Wqs~e. water TrearmeriLFacilitie~ <br />We also disagree with the Star Tribune's use of annual numbers of violations recorded in the <br />database since 1992 as a method of identifying a trend or comparing Minnesota to other states, <br />Because permits issued today have more requirements than those issued a six or seven years ago <br />or those issued in other states, there are more chances that a MLtmesota facility today might not <br />meet a requirement on occasion~ (The number of permit requirements since 1992 has increased <br />32% for major industrial permits and 10% for major municipal permits.) <br /> <br />In.qtead, we have proposed that the Star Tribune use a .compliance rate (100% - (# violations/# of <br />requirements x 100)) to determine trends. The attached table shows the compliance rate from <br />major facilities in the past seven fiscal years. <br /> <br />In general, the state has reason to be pleased with the environmental performance of these <br />wastewater treatment facilities. Despite increasing requirements and more stringent limits <br /> <br /> TDD (for hem~nt m~d apr~ch impalred onty): (612)282-5332 <br />~rinted on recycled ptlper co~ztm'n/ng at lea~t l O% fib~r~ from paper r~cy~lcd by con~ner$ <br /> <br /> <br />