My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRSR INFORMATION 01-02-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
1993-2000
>
1997
>
01-02-1997 SPECIAL
>
PRSR INFORMATION 01-02-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2015 10:13:38 AM
Creation date
2/25/2015 10:13:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRSR
date
1/2/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
who visited that park during the past twelve months. Lions Park <br /> 411 ranked second at a usage rate of sixty-six percent. Facilities. <br /> located at the schools drew visitors from fifty-one percent of <br /> the households in Elk River. Handke Outdoor Ice Arena and the <br /> softball complex attracted members of about forty percent of the <br /> households in the city during the past year. Woodland Trails <br /> Park, virtually undeveloped, was visited by only ten percent of <br /> the sample's households. While Orono Park is the pre-eminent <br /> facility in the park system, Lions Park and school-based . <br /> offerings also serve large segments of the community. <br /> Park visitors were queried about the types of recreational <br /> facilities they used, most frequently. Most respondents reported <br /> passively walking around the park they visited. But, the <br /> swimming beach was used on at least an occasional basis, by sixty <br /> percent of the households in the city. Softball fields and play <br /> equipment served about forty percent of the households. The <br /> picnic pavillions, sliding hills, and soccer fields possessed a <br /> smaller, but significant audience within Elk River. In <br /> comparison with other communities, Elk River residents use the <br /> park and recreational facilities in atypically high numbers: <br /> The City received kudos for its maintenance and upkeep of <br /> the park facilities. Eighty-eight percent approved of the city's <br /> efforts, while only eight percent expressed disapproval. As for <br /> unmet needs, only trails were mentioned frequently enough, at <br /> 4 seven percent, to warrant further study. <br /> The residents were asked their opinion of a more extensive <br /> trail system to' link the city's neighborhoods. The concept was <br /> favored by a large seventy-six percent majority. .However., when <br /> the subject of property;, tax increases to pay for its development' <br /> was :-raised, half of the support changed opinions: _a forty <br /> percent to thirty-eight percent negative verdict occurred. There <br /> would be substantial difficulty, consequently, in 'passing a <br /> referendum at this time. <br /> A nearly similar - pattern emerged on the question of a <br /> downtown river walk.'4 'Seventy-three,:percent; favored the concept. <br /> But, if property " tax :increases would be required to fund the <br /> construction,- a.:forty-four; percent to thirty-seven percent <br /> plurality emerged .in favor of ".the" prod ect This project would .be <br /> viable at the polls, ,but;.a highly effective and aggressive <br /> campaign would be needed to carry._the day. <br /> Residents :felt strongly, - °however, ;about the characteristics <br /> •should serve both pedestrians bicyclists. Seventy 'P = : i <br /> of any trail .,s stem in, v Seventy-six percent felt t <br /> - <br /> .,,system <br /> nty ' percent <br /> wanted to see; the -recently_;';purchased abandoned railroad corridor <br /> . developed :°into' a -component_of the system And, surpr singly, <br /> one-half of the residents, would -grant the, an easement if thee.: <br /> Aft trail - system ran_`"by theirproperty.:� Reinforcing _these,;results,` <br /> lip trails were also narrowly ;designated the 'priority for ' <br /> development, edging:',smaller neighborhood- parks and outdistancing <br /> larger community playfields concept, then,; is highly <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.