My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.0. PRSR 01-02-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
1993-2000
>
1997
>
01-02-1997 SPECIAL
>
5.0. PRSR 01-02-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2015 10:11:09 AM
Creation date
2/25/2015 10:11:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRSR
date
1/2/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> 69. Have you or any members of this YES 61% <br /> household visited Hennepin NO 38% <br /> • County, Wright County, or Anoka DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 1% <br /> County regional parks during <br /> the past year? <br /> 70. Do you feel that Sherburne County YES 51% <br /> should develop a county regional NO 32% <br /> park system, or do neighboring DON'T KNOW/REFUSED17% <br /> counties provide adequate <br /> facilities for county residents? <br /> 71. Would you favor or oppose the FAVOR/STILL FAVOR 44% <br /> development of a downtown FAVOR/OPPOSE 16% <br /> river walk for recreational FAVOR/DON'T KNOW 13% <br /> use? (IF "FAVOR" , ASK: ) Would OPPOSE 21% <br /> you still favor it if a tax DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 5% <br /> increase were required to fund <br /> construction? <br /> I would like to read you a list of facilities which could be <br /> added to the park system. For each one, please tell me how <br /> likely it would be that you. or members of your household would <br /> use it very likely, somewhat likely, not too likely, or not at <br /> all likely. If you don't know, just say so. <br /> VERY SMWT NOT TOO NOT D.K. <br /> ill 72 . Sand volleyball courts? 10% 26% 22% 40% 2% <br /> 73 . Play equipment? 19% 25% 15% 39% 1% <br /> 74 . Horseshoe pits? 5% 21% 23% 51% 1% <br /> 75. Basketball courts? 10% 22% 19% 48% 1% <br /> 76. Archery ranges? 8% 15% 20% 55% 2% <br /> 77 . Cross country ski course? 17% 27% 14% 40% 1% <br /> 78 . Outdoor swimming pool? 31% 34% 8% 26% 2% <br /> 79. Nature area with an ed- <br /> ucational interpretive <br /> center? 29% 37% 15% 18% 1% <br /> 80. Nature trail with explana- <br /> tory sign posts? 33% 41% 11% 14% 1% <br /> 81. Are there any other recreational facilities you feel should <br /> be a high priority for development? (IF "YES" , ASK: ) What <br /> are they? <br /> DON'T KNOW, 14%; NONE, 63%; TEEN CENTER, 2%; BIKE TRAILS, <br /> 4%; CHILDREN, 2%; NATURE TRAILS, 2%; EXERCISE/HEALTH CLUB, <br /> 2% ; SWIMMING POOL, 2%; TENNIS COURTS, 1%; CLEAN UP ORONO <br /> BEACH, 1%; NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, 1%; ICE RINK, 1%; SCATTERED, <br /> 4O. <br /> As you may know, the city and School District cooperate to <br /> provide several recreational programs. In the future, as the <br /> • city grows, two options are available: the City could enter into <br /> a joint agreement with the School District or could offer <br /> 153 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.