My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-2004 CC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
04-12-2004 CC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:32 AM
Creation date
5/3/2004 7:22:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
4/12/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes <br />April 12, 2004 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />Mr. Kdaers stated that he could finalize that piece of the puzzle but that he didn't see any <br />immediate urgency. He stated that from this General Government area, there would be no more <br />than two additional staff reporting to him, and maybe it's one. <br /> <br />Councilmember Tveite agrees that the next important consolidation area is the Community <br />Development area, and then the Administration/Finance area. <br /> <br />Council_member Dietz stated that council has talked about city vision and reorganization, but the <br />main point of this exercise and the way that it started was the relationship between the city <br />administrator and the department heads, how they communicate and what needs to be done, and <br />he doesn't want the council to lose focus that that was the point of this whole mission. He <br />stated that he had heard from several staff members regarding the memo in the packet. His <br />response to people is that this is just the administrator's opinion and, in his view, the council <br />wouldn't do anything until council has done the three sessions with the consultant Brimeyer. <br />He also stated that council would be receiving input from all the department heads. <br /> <br />Mr. IClaers stated that he compiled the information as he was asked to do and gave the council <br />his professional opinion, not the opinion from all 16-department heads. Mr. Klaers stated that <br />this was his assignment. Yes, it will cost money to go through organizational changes and to add <br />upper level positions. He feels in the hiring of a Community, Development Director that if the <br />city promotes internally, you would have to replace that person. The Public Works Director and <br />the Engineering Department will be expensive and we will have to decide when it is the right <br />time and whether we can afford it. Nix. I<laers stated that ~vith the assignment to eliminate the <br />number of direct reports by half, it ~vas going to impact people. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dietz stated that his idea with the exception of the Park & Recreation Director <br />position was that all candidates could be internal for these department head positions. Mr. <br />I~daers stated that that is what he is suggesting with Community Development, and that some of <br />the other positions could also come from within. <br /> <br />Councilmember Motion stated that we need the Assistant Administrator position in the <br />organizational chart as well (for the General Government area). He feels that this position <br />should be considered even before the Public Works position. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dietz asked if the City Administrator, in regards to the Community <br />Development position, is saying that anyone in that area would be eligible to apply. Mr. Klaers <br />stated that this is a council decision but that he could give his recommendation regarding whom <br />to promote if this is what the council desires. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kuester feels that it should be open to internal and external candidates and to <br />follow the same process that we would follow for external candidates. <br /> <br />' Mayor Klinzing stated that the council may be aware of issues from those applying and the <br /> council didn't want to put the Administrator in an awkward position. <br /> <br />Councilmember Tveite asked about the city prosecuting attorney and when he was hired it was <br />to have him with the police department, why is this not the situadon. <br /> <br />Councilmember Motin stated that could be a problem with protocol; there should be separation <br />of duty. He stated that he likes this overall proposal; that it is pretty close and that we just need <br />to complete the Administration/Finance area. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.