My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12.0. PRSR 08-12-1998
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
1993-2000
>
1998
>
08-12-1998
>
12.0. PRSR 08-12-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2015 3:09:09 PM
Creation date
2/18/2015 3:09:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRSR
date
8/12/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• "APPENDIX B" <br /> FEASIBILITY STUDY - PHASE I <br /> Our feasibility studies are broken down into five typical Work Tasks. <br /> TASK #1 - TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF EXISTING FACILITY <br /> (not applicable) <br /> TASK #2 - DEVELOP NEW CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM <br /> Work for this Task would include conceptual development of a new proposed <br /> outdoor family aquatic center. This p 'on o t e study would address such items <br /> as evaluation of the proposed site, determination of the City's aquatic programming <br /> needs, probable construction and operating costs, determination of the type and <br /> configuration of pool facility to best meet the community's needs and establishment <br /> of a project concept. The following is a detailed description of the work which we <br /> would perform for this task of the feasibility study: <br /> 1. Perform a technical an alysis of two sites for placement of the new family <br /> aquatic center. Our firm has developed rigid technical review requirements in <br /> which 17 categories of analyses are provided for the site, including field check of <br /> elevations and existing utilities, effect on surrounding neighbors, traffic patterns, <br /> accessibility for the users, etc; <br /> 2. Review projections of the Community's demographic trends and analyze <br /> recent swimming pool usage data and advise on the demand for aquatics in the <br /> Community; — -- . <br /> 3. Perform a mark eting study including on-site evaluation of surrounding <br /> communities' aquatic facilities highlighting their relative strengths and <br /> programming; <br /> 4. Review proposed programming with City__ Team determine optimum <br /> programming needs and define which facilities can best s handle those needs. <br /> Develop a system wide approach to meeting the communities aquatic needs; <br /> 5. We would then perform a detailed aquatic sizing of the proposed pool <br /> vessel, as required to meet the communities needs for the next 25 years; <br /> ID <br /> 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.