Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Action <br />To <br />Item Number <br />Planning Commission <br />5.2 <br />Agenda Section <br />Meeting Date <br />Prepared by <br />Planning Items <br />January 27, 2015 <br />Zack Carlton, Planner I <br />Item Description <br />Reviewed by <br />Request by Phoenix Enterprises for Conditional <br />Jeremy Barnhart, Deputy Director CODD <br />Use Permit to permit a changeable copy sign larger <br />than 30 square feet <br />Reviewed by <br />Public Hearing, Case No. CU 15 -02 <br />Action Requested <br />Recommend, by motion, approval or denial of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as proposed. If a <br />recommendation of approval is recommended, staff suggests the following conditions: <br />1. The Conditional Use Permit is not a building permit and the applicant must apply <br />for and receive approval of all required permits before construction may begin. <br />2. Submit technical specifications showing the sign complies with all requirements in <br />Section 30 -864 (e). <br />Background /Discussion <br />Rick Foster representing Phoenix Enterprises LLC is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow <br />construction of a sign with a changeable copy portion in excess of 30 square feet. The sign is proposed to <br />replace an existing sign at 19260 Evans St. NW in the Hillside Crossing South subdivision. The property <br />is zoned Highway Commercial (C -3) and permits signs of up to 150 square feet in area and 30 feet in <br />height. <br />The proposed sign is 30 feet tall and has an overall sign area of 136 square feet, meeting ordinance <br />standards. The changeable copy section of the sign is approximately 50 square feet, requiring a CUP. The <br />sign is sited in a similar location as the current sign, approximately 16 feet from the property line, meeting <br />the ten foot setback required for all signs. The existing sign will be removed. <br />Applicable Regulations <br />Changeable Copy Signs <br />The city requires a CUP to allow for the more formal review of potential impacts associated with some <br />types of development, and to impose conditions intended to mitigate those concerns. In this case, <br />impacts to nearby motorists resulting from the display of a large digital changeable copy sign. Impacts <br />may include distracted driving as motorists wait for and read the next image. The Planning Commission <br />should evaluate the impacts that may result from the construction of the sign, and decide whether or not <br />the application meets city standards for the issuance of a CUP. <br />In an effort to reduce driver distraction, city ordinance includes specific regulations to address potentially <br />negative visual impact. The regulations from Sec. 30 -864 (e) are as follows: <br />NW- UR <br />