My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. SR 12-17-2001
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2001
>
12/17/2001
>
5.1. SR 12-17-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:31 AM
Creation date
4/29/2004 7:11:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/17/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEC-13-2001 IO:ASAM FROM-ERMU T63-441-8098 T-044 P.OD2/O0~ F-38Z <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />Regular meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br />December 11, 2001 <br /> <br />5.3 Administration Buildin~ Update <br /> <br /> Pat Klaers and representatives 'from Tushie Montgomery Architects appeared to discuss the plans for <br />the City Hall expansion, including the time frames. Pat Klaers advised that the City Council is prepared to <br />make decisions on the time frames for the planning on December 18, 2001. The City Council would like to <br />be advised on the plans of the Utility by that time. <br /> The Architect representatives, and Pat Klaers presented plans with three options the Cit3(. is <br />considering, with Utility space included in ail three plans. A proposal from the City's architect to do the <br />necessary architectural/engineering work for the Utilities' portion of the project. <br /> George Zabee questioned the cost estimates, and the bidding process. He further added that he feels <br />flue present location of the Utilities is adequate for at least five years, and asks if the area could be made <br />availabIe in the future. The architects replied favorably, noting that construction of the Utility portion would <br />be the final stage, with completion later in 2004. ~lohn Dietz approves of the Utility portion being at the tail <br />end of the construction stage. It would guarantee that the Utility would be able to take advantage of the <br />present bidding system, with cost savings. George Zabee is not prepared to make a decision at this meeting, <br />preferring to postpone finalization until all Conunissioners are present. <br /> It was decided to call a Special Meeting for Thursday, December 20, 2001 to discuss the option of <br />the Utilities being included in the City Hail expansion. <br /> <br />5.4 L. andfill Gas Project Updat~ <br /> <br /> The remaining contract issues between Sherbume County, Waste Management, and ER_MU have <br />tentatively been resolved, as well as the engineering drawing review. Staffpresented the Commission with <br />spread sheets explaining the revenues, operation, and maintenance cost portions of the project. Staff <br />recommends that Attorney Ron Black review each agreement with the Commission at a future meeting. <br /> <br />5.5 Substation North Connection, Agreement <br /> <br /> The Connection Agreement between GRE and ERMU was presented for consideration and review by <br />Commission. The terms and conditions of the agreement are similar to previous Connection Agreements <br />except that in this case, GRE will pay for their transmission modifications and metering. A savings of <br />$250,000 will be realized by the ER.MU. At the same time, GRE would like to purchase the metering for <br />station 14 and sub bank 1 & 2 along with 69 Ky switch at west sub bank 1, at approximately $21,500. <br /> The time frames for bidding, construction, and completion were discussed. Completion is anticipated <br />in late Summer, 2002. <br /> <br /> George Zabee moved to authorize Staff to execute the Connection Agreement between GKE and Elk <br />River Municipal Utilities. John Dietz seconded the motion. Motion carried 2-0. <br /> <br />6.1 Review & Consider Policy, C. hange for Budget Billin~ <br /> <br /> The Minnesota Energy Security & Reliability Act will in 2002 require utilities to provide a customer <br />budget billing plan. To comply with this requirement, Staff is proposing to add the Budget Helper Plan <br />Section 13 of our Meter Deposit & Related Services Policy. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.