My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.0. SR 12-03-2001
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2001
>
12/03/2001
>
4.0. SR 12-03-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:31 AM
Creation date
4/28/2004 8:15:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/3/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Employment <br /> <br />Employment is a critical component to the housing market. The nine largest employers are <br />illustrated in Table 5. Each employer was interviewed to assess local economic conditions <br />including number of employees, wages, historic and future growth, and the need for additional <br />housing. During the past two years six of the employers have grown in size and the remaining <br />three have stayed the same. All but one employer indicated that the local economic climate is <br />good. A variety of employers indicated that they anticipate their businesses to grow over the <br />next two years. <br /> <br />The largest employer in the City of Elk River is the school district with 1,250 employees. The <br />second largest employer is Sherburne County with approximately 470 employees. Most <br />employers would not disclose average wage data to provide a general overview of approximate <br />wages paid by area employers. A 1999 Business Reten. tion and Expansion Survey found the Elk <br />River average industrial wage to be $11.54 per hour. The Minnesota Department of Economic <br />Security also produces wage survey information and found that the average hourly wage for the <br />Manufacturing sector in Sherbume County was $18.35 per hour for the second quarter of 2000. <br /> <br />Employers were also asked to comment on the local housing market based on their experience <br />with employees. All nine employers indicated that more moderate-income housing is needed in <br />the con~nunity. Just under 80% of the employers indicated that the addition of more moderate <br />income housing would be of benefit to their business. Moderate-income housing is typically <br />defined as housing for households earning 80% or less of the area median income. For <br />Sherburne County this would be $60,320 based on the HUD 2001 median household income of <br />$75,400. This would equate to rental housing that is generally priced under $1,500 per month <br />including rent, utilities and garages. For homeownership this would be a maximum purchase <br />price of $190,800. <br /> <br />According to a 2001 Labor Force Assessment which was completed for Sherburne County, <br />residents of the County conmaute a wide variety of distances to work each day. Commuting <br />patterns indicate that residents are commuting to various locations primarily following a pattern <br />along Interstate 94. The patterns are not heavily concentrated in one County or City. <br /> <br />Approximately 35% of those surveyed traveled 0 to 10 miles to work one-way. For those that <br />commute 46 or more minutes each way, they indicated they would take a median decrease of <br />$2.40 per hour to have a 0 to 15 minute commute. On the other hand those that convolute 0 to 15 <br />minutes per day would need to eam a median increase of $7.00 per hour to drive 46 or more <br />minutes with 47% indicating they were unwilling. The study also found that the largest share of <br />workers had an annual pre-tax salary of $20,000 to $40,000. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.