My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9.0. SR 11-19-2001
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2001
>
11/19/2001
>
9.0. SR 11-19-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:30 AM
Creation date
4/28/2004 7:38:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/19/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ci[y Hall- Police Station E~,cpansion Commiltee <br /> Page 4 <br /> <br />There are a number of issues for the City Council to discuss. Hopefully some decisions will <br />be made at the Monday, November 19, 2001, meeting. At a minimum we'd like to get a <br />decision on building layout options and resolve the fire department location issue. Ideally, <br />we would make some decisions about how to fund the police facility and whether or not we <br />should move forward with a police/fire hall facility together at one time. Another decision to <br />consider relates to the public safety complex and whether the facility should be funded with <br />tax monies and if the project should be considered now or next fall. <br /> <br />The next step in this building project process is to have the City Council authorize Tushie <br />Montgomery to move forward into the design phase. This would be part of the architectural <br />contract for the project. Architectural services generally run in the 7.5% range. This design <br />work will get the city to the point of being able to go out for construction documents and <br />this design work will give us good cost estimates for the project. The cost for the design <br />services may need to be adjusted if the fire department is included in the proposal. Also, a <br />separate proposal will most likely be needed for the utilities facility. It is appropriate for the <br />Utilities Commission to consider this information and provide an indication to the City <br />Council on how it wants to proceed. A joint meeting with the commission may also be <br />appropriate. <br /> <br />We will need to move forward soon if we are going to try for a spring building project. As <br />previously discussed with the City Council, the city can stop the project at any time including <br />after the design phase due to lack of funds being available or the need to downsize the <br />project. <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> <br />· September 24, 2001, CouncilMinutes <br />· Site Options <br />· Program Analysis <br />· Budget <br />· Schedule <br />· Original Tushie-Montgomery Proposal for Design Services <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.