Laserfiche WebLink
The proposed DC,-3 design provides for the disposal of demolition and construction debris atop the <br />existing landfill within the transition zone, bdnging the area up to a 3:1 grade, consistent with the <br />northern and southern areas of the landfill. This will not only eliminate the surface water issues over <br />this area, but will also provide for a better overall final contour configuration of the entire western side of <br />the landfill. The DC-3 area will be final covered with an MSVV cap, as ulflized over the rest of the ERI_ <br /> <br />Although not required by Minnesota Solid Waste Rules, the proposed DC-3 design includes provisions <br />for leachate management and collection. Leachate would be contained behind a lined berm, which <br />would be constructed at the toe of the existing final cover. Leachate would be pumped from a sump <br />into a leachate storage tank. The proposed berm would be constructed such that no additional waste <br />would be placed outside the existing waste footprint. The DC-3 proposal does not extend the waste fill <br />boundaries for the site. <br /> <br />The attached grading and final contour plans show the location of the proposed DC-3 development. <br />ERL provided detailed engineering plans to the City of Elk River, Sherbume County and the MPCA in <br />the spdng of this year. ERL met with representa~ves of each ~organization to address specific <br />engineering items to arrive at the current proposal, dated July 27~', 2001. The MPCA has public <br />noticed this proposal, as well as the January 2000 repermit application and anticipates delivering a new <br />permit to ERL by the end of October. Sherbume County an~dpates a st. afl revision to the County <br />Ucense, with subsequent board approval. Pending City of Elk River Approval and favorable weather, <br />ER.[. antidpates construction of the area by December 1. <br /> <br />BUFFER/SCREENING CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />As mentioned above, the DC-3 ama does not increase the waste fill footprint of the site. There will, <br />however, need to be grading at the toe of the slope for the DC-3 berm. As well, as the rest of the site <br />progresses in accordance with the approved January 2000 repermit plans, there will need to be grading <br />and shaping of landfill berm sideslopes, extension of the sedimentation basin on the west side of the <br />landfill, and the construction of access roads. The attached air photo shows the existing vegetation <br />coverage elong the western side of the landfill. Tree loss can be viewed by overlying the proposed <br />future development activities over the photo. <br /> <br />ERL acknowledges the impedance saving and maintaining as many trees as possible and is very <br />conscience of the need to screen the landfill from the trail users. ERL welcomes the opportunity to <br />work with the City and/or the Trail Group to develop an acceptable plan, which would likely include .the <br />placement of conifers along the west and south slopes of the sedimentation ponds (see attachment <br />screening plan). <br /> <br />· Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />