My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1.a. ERMUSR 11-18-2014
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2014
>
11-18-2014 SPECIAL
>
6.1.a. ERMUSR 11-18-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2014 11:32:34 AM
Creation date
12/10/2014 11:32:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
11/18/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Let the Debate Begin resource and financial planning. This can be accomplished <br /> by considering a number of key questions, including: <br /> These developments have triggered debates in regulatory <br /> proceedings in a growing number of states. For example, How much are different types of customers willing <br /> state regulators recently authorized Arizona Public Service to pay for greener energy? Is that willingness to pay <br /> (APS) to temporarily charge net metered solar PV higher, lower, or the same if the energy is provided by <br /> customers a 70 cent-per-kilowatt ($5.00 per month) fixed distributed generation resources, rather than utility scale <br /> generation resources? <br /> charge, and deferred the broader issue to the utility's next <br /> general rate case. "I view Arizona as a victory for the What is the total actual cost of different distributed vs. <br /> utilities," said Gimigliano. "In their attempt to recapture utility-scale renewable energy generation resources, <br /> cost from solar customers, establishing a fee sets a and how do those costs compare with the cost of <br /> precedent as one way to tackle recouping some cost. electricity generated by conventional resources?What <br /> Arizona's$5 fee may well set the floor, not the ceiling, is your company's plan for communicating these costs <br /> for the magnitude of fees in other states." However, as to your customers and regulators, and how will it <br /> measure the success of those efforts? <br /> Perlstein noted, "The debate is far from over, if only <br /> because the actual cross-subsidy solar PV customers of Are net metering and other public policies in the <br /> APS are receiving is more than $5 per month." jurisdictions in which your company serves <br /> The issue is being debated in a growing number of states customers subsidizing certain generation technologies <br /> and/or energy providers over others?Are those <br /> with significant solar generation potential. The discussion differences consistent with public policy, and/could <br /> is particularly vigorous in Colorado and California where a those incentives be provided in a more efficient way? <br /> 2013 California PUC-sponsored study concluded that What is your company's strategy for engaging <br /> the current$1 billion cross-subsidy received by net regulators and other key stakeholders on these issues, <br /> metered solar PV customers will reach $20 billion by and what policy changes would your company like to <br /> 2020. This debate is growing, and is unlikely to be see? How would your company articulate and measure <br /> resolved for some time. the benefits of those policies? <br /> Regardless of the magnitude of the impact of distributed What role(s), if any, should your regulated utility or its <br /> and utility-scale generation on retail electricity prices, it nonregulated subsidiary play in the growth of distrib- <br /> may be time to be much more direct and transparent uted generation within and/or outside your regulated <br /> with customers regarding the actual costs of distributed service area? Should it own, lease,and/or help custom- <br /> generation. Direct customer communications, rate design ers finance their purchases of distributed generation <br /> changes and tariffs could be adjusted to accomplish this. systems?What is your company's strategy for engaging <br /> Adding the correct pricing signals may have the added regulators and other key stakeholders on these issues, <br /> and what policy changes would you like to see? <br /> benefit of encouraging energy management and <br /> conservation efforts by customers, mitigating rising What impact is the design of your current electricity <br /> energy costs. Ultimately these actions should result in rates having on the strength of customer preferences <br /> more sustainable greener energy strategies and policies. for or against distributed generation, as opposed to <br /> purchasing power produced by conventional generation <br /> Therefore it's important for utilities to be active in working resources? Should certain retail rates be redesigned to <br /> with regulators and other key stakeholders in refreshing remove unintended incentives,or add incentives, <br /> energy policies in areas they serve and to take a fresh look in light of public policy and utility goals?What is your <br /> at their own strategies for enhancement. company's strategy for engaging regulators and other <br /> Key Considerations for Your Distributed <br /> key stakeholders on these issues, and what policy <br /> changes would you like to see? <br /> and Green Energy Strategy <br /> How will your company's renewable and distributed <br /> In light of these developments, it may be time for your 6 energy resources and/or policies be affected by foresee- <br /> company to focus more on its green and distributed able innovations in energy storage, fuel cell, and/or <br /> energy generation policies and strategies in doing microgrid technologies or changes in natural gas prices? <br /> KPMG Regulatory Issues Associated with Distributed Generation and Renewable Energy 17 <br /> 115 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.