My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-20-2014 EDA MIN
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Minutes
>
2011 - 2020
>
2014
>
10-20-2014 EDA MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2015 11:47:47 AM
Creation date
11/20/2014 2:34:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDM
date
10/20/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Economic Development Authority Minutes Page 2 <br />October 20, 2014 <br />Q11 10 I 71 I - - 4 <br />0001&3�� <br />No one appeared for Open Forum. <br />5.1 Stonesthrow Properties, LLC (Coin-Tainer) Tax Abatement arL1, <br />Microloan Review <br />Mr. Barnhart presented the staff report. He stated the Finance Committee met earlier <br />that day to review Coin-Tainer's tax abatement and 1111"croloan application and <br />determined that the corruTintee was not able to approve the application and were <br />requesting the applicant resubmit. The committee expressed concerns with <br />establishing; a precedence allowitig for 1 00"/o abatement for the existing building. Mr. <br />Barnhart explained that most of the abatements that have been approved were on <br />vacant land with no building on that land with the exception of The Bank of Elk <br />River (the city abated the tax increment difference between the value at that time and <br />the value that was being proposed in 2006, with a major addition). <br />Mr. Barnhart outlined the questions from the Finance Committee: <br />1) What are the future projections of both companies. <br />2) What is the absorption of the lease rates for the existing tenants on the property <br />and will any cash flow would be impacted. <br />3) There is concern with the contract For deed terms, and when the balloon <br />payment is due in 5 years how the permanent financing will Impact cash flow. <br />4) The committee wanted a better understanding of the guarantees of the <br />nucroloan. <br />Mr. Barnhart stated the committee would have a better level of comfort to make a <br />decision after receiving answers to these questions. He requested the public hearing <br />be opened and either closed or continued to next month to allow staff time to work <br />with the applicant. He requested input from the EDP on the question of abatement <br />for an existing building and the comfort level an abating 100% of the value or a <br />portion of the increment. <br />Mikaela Huot from Springsted and the applicant, Dave Walters, were present to <br />answer questions, <br />President Tvelte opened the public hearing. No one spoke. President] I veite left the <br />public hearing open during discussion. <br />Commissioner Motin asked for clarification regarding abatement of existing <br />buildings. <br />Mr. Barnhart provided a handout with a summary of businesses that were abated <br />since 2004. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.