6.7. SR 04-19-2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The Planning Commission ~) ~ & ~g=~ Pa§e5 March 23, 2004 Jim Nord, 19165 Hudson Circle, joint applicant, stated that he did not feel they shotdd be held to any higher standards than other developers of wooded properties have been such as Lafayette Woods. He stated that in 1993, his family granted a 70-£oot utility easement to the City which was dear-cut by the City. Steve Parker, 19530 Albany Circle, stated that he feels it will be a disaster to develop the property as proposed and did not see why the City was willing to give up such a valuable resoLlrce. Neil Christy, 19488 Boston Street, expressed his concern for traffic and the narrow street width. City Engineer Terry Maurer explained that the streets will be the same width as those in Nordic Hills and Nordic Woods. He stated that the developer of Nordic Hills requested to have the widened street access and median at County Road 1; it was not a requirement of the City. The City agreed to allow the access and he anticipated that a similar access would be done for Woodland Hills. Mike Niziolek, 12275 Rush Circle, representing the Park and Recreation Commission, stated that he feels this is a priceless oppommity to save a significant forest. There being no further public comment, Chair Ropp closed the public hearing. Commissioner Anderson stated that even though this proposal is less dense than the previous proposal, he still felt there would be a significant impact to the environment of the area. He stated that he will vote to oppose the plat because of the physical characteristics of the property, including the trees, vegetation, and topography. He stated that he fek the developed should be able to come up with a more creadve plan with less impact on the environment. Commissioner Stevens stated that he concurred with Commissioner Anderson's comments. He did not feel the site was suitable for the level of development being proposed. He stated that the developer needs to work around the topography and try to maintain the environmental characteristics. Commissioner Stevens stated that preservation of trees should go beyond a 200-foot buffer. Commissioner Ropp stated that he concurred that the site is not suitable for the density proposed. He stated that the topography of the site will be changed entirely and that he is not in favor of approving the request. MOVED BY COMMISSIONER STEVENS AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CURTIS TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE REQUEST BY S & A FAMILY INVESTMENTS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF WOODLAND HILLS, CASE NO. P 04-02, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: THE PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SITE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TOPOGRAPHY, SOILS, VEGETATION, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO EROSION AND SILTATION, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO FLOODING, AND DRAINAGE ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR THE TYPE AND DENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT AND USES CONTEMPLATED. 2. BECAUSE OF THE AMOUNT OF GRADING REQUIRED AND THE LARGE NUMBER OF MATURE TREES THAT WILL BE REMOVED, THE