Laserfiche WebLink
The rear yard setback deviation from the R-3 requirements is to provide buffers around the wetlands. <br /> Applicable Regulation <br /> Rezonin <br /> In reviewing proposed request, consideration shall be given to existing conditions within the area <br /> directly and indirectly affected by the proposal, the conservation of property values, the use to which the <br /> property affected is being devoted at the time, and relevant provisions,if any,in the land use plan. <br /> It appears that the request is consistent with all of these standards. <br /> Subdivision <br /> These findings are necessary for the city council approval of the preliminary plat and the final plat: <br /> 1, Tlie proposed sitbditision is consislent ivill)II)e tio <br /> nu/ re galafions(article V7 q1'11)is cl),aplet) and conforms in all <br /> 'g <br /> respects ivill)till requirements o this Code, inelltdili <br /> ,g the:Zo ' re <br /> nl/�g gulalions and//)if article. <br /> 2 The proposed subdivision is consistent nV11)all eoplit-ablegeneral and jpet-ia#:Zedni�i, eouqy, and re <br /> ,gionalplans, <br /> including, but not kivited to., the city's comps-ehensh)e dei)elopienlplan. <br /> 3. The physical char'ac'teristics Of the site, ine' lif 'g diii <br /> but not lihii/ed to topqgn-oly, soils, vegetation, suseeptiNk!),to <br /> erosion andsillation, sysceplil2ihty lofloodiii <br /> �g, and drainage are sitilaNeftr the type and density of deivlopliient <br /> and uses tontelvplated <br /> 4. The proposed subdivision snakes adeqaale pl-wisionjbr mater supply, storm drainage, seiveige transportation, <br /> erosion twIlrol and all ollvi•senices,-/anilifies and i1vpzoiewen1s otherwise required in this alliele. <br /> 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause <br /> substantial ent)hviinzental damage. <br /> 6. The proposed subdivision mill not conflict with easements qfivcord or with easements established by jlfdglnenl q1'a <br /> ('oud. <br /> 7. The pi-oposed'snbdiri'sion will not haiv an undue and adrerse impact on 11)e i-easonable development q1'ne og.'ibon'llg <br /> land. <br /> S. The proposed subdivision is nolpreniature.A subdivision is premature i1'arly qf the ft1lon"I'll exists; <br /> 'g <br /> a. Lack q1'adequate slonnn)afer drainage. <br /> b. Lack qfadequate. roads. <br /> c. Lack of adeyuute,ranitta��seiner�,ctems. <br /> d. Lack of-adequate off site public itipw)eIvents orslopod syslevls. <br /> In the review of the standards for preliminary and final plat as outlined, it appears that the request is <br /> consistent with all of these standards. <br /> Financial Impact <br /> None <br /> Attachments <br /> • Location Map <br /> • <br /> Environmental Technician Memo dated July 9, 2014 <br /> ■ Landscape plan from 2003 <br /> • Preliminary Plat (Development Plan) <br /> • Final Plat <br /> N:\I)�,,partiiietits\(:oiiii-nutiiiv I)eN-clol)tiictit\l'laiiniiig\(,,.ise 1`i1c,,\ZC\XC 14-05 West Oaks 5th-6th\ZC 144)5,;r PC 9-23-14\\",,,t Oaks.docx <br />