Laserfiche WebLink
Police Department <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />Joan Schmidt, City Clerk <br /> <br />Jeffrey A. Beahen, Chief of Police <br /> <br />1-29-04 <br /> <br />Alcohol Compliance Checl<s <br /> <br />On t-28-2004 our department, in cooperation with Sherbume Count7 PubLic Health <br />cofi-~t~'~SdTIcohol compliance checks at twentT-one Licensed establishments in _~&~C!.¢'_.P._f <br />Elk Privet. Nineteen of those businesses passed the compliance checks. T_WO 0.f d?.se <br />businesses actually sold alcohol to ~rnnors. Those businesses were: <br /> <br />1) Cenex <br /> 13374 Highway 10 (Case ~04-002504) <br /> 30-year old clerk sold alcohol to ~T2nor. Did check ID and scanned it but thought <br /> drinking age was 18. <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />Elk Bowl <br />13161 Highway 10 (Case #04-002505) <br />46-year old male sold alcohol to minor-did not check ID. Manager and other <br />employees were sitting at the bar when sale took place. Later commented that <br />they thought the person should have been carded. <br /> <br />Compliance checkers made the comment that although the rest of the establis?u'nents <br />passed, that in at least two other businesses, the staff person had to go check with a <br />manager or another employee to determine if the person being carded xvas old enough to <br />dri~nX. In one business the server thought the legal age was 18, in the other they thought it <br />was 19. <br /> <br />Both employees at the two non-compliance locations were charged with sale to minors. <br />Please contact me if you have questions concerning this process and results. <br /> <br /> <br />