Laserfiche WebLink
It does not do the county or the city any good to be in this type of stalemate. This difference <br />of opinion could ultimately lead to a legal batde, a delay in the project, and more expenses to <br />the county when the project actually happens. It is the dissemination of public information <br />regarding the project that is important at this time and we know that the project will at a <br />minimum have to meet the city code requirements for such things as property line setbacks <br />and landscaping standards. If these minimum code conditions cannot be met, then a <br />variance would be requized. I have no reason to believe that the proposal will requize <br />significant changes or that there will be staff, Council, or public concerns that are raised that <br />can not be adequately ad&essed. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br />It is recommended that the City Council resend its motion that it made on September 15, <br />2003 and that it conduct a site plan review of the jail expansion at the City Council meeting <br />on April 5, 2004 at 6:30 p.m. at the school small theatre. This decision would then require <br />the City Council to change the topic and meeting location of the special meeting that has <br />already been called for April 5, 2004. <br /> <br />S: ~Council\Pat~2004\J ailExpansion, doc <br /> <br /> <br />