My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.1. SR 09-02-2014
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2014
>
09-02-2014
>
10.1. SR 09-02-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2014 11:55:04 AM
Creation date
8/29/2014 8:04:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/2/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the placement of signs within the public right-of-way is a means in which many of the aforementioned <br /> concerns are addressed. <br /> Much of the city's enforcement action pertaining to signs involves the public right-of-way. When signs <br /> are removed they are taken to the city maintenance facility where the public can retrieve them during <br /> normal business hours. Signs located within either a county or state right-of-way are often removed by <br /> the respective jurisdiction in which there is often no recourse to reclaim the sign. <br /> While staff works diligently to enforce various city ordinances, such enforcement action is limited by staff <br /> availability and resources. Staff, however,will enforce city ordinances equally and fairly. <br /> Topics for Discussion <br /> The purpose of this discussion is to provide a brief overview of the city's current sign ordinance and to <br /> get Council direction to modify or expand the scope of the city's current ordinances pertaining to signs. <br /> Some options for Council to consider include: <br /> 1. Leaving the existing city code in place. <br /> 2. Abolishing restrictions on signage,in whole or in part. <br /> 3. Allowing for additional exemptions within the city code. <br /> Some cities, such as Maple Grove,have included language in their ordinance to allow for the posting of <br /> certain types of signs in the public right-of-way. As an example, � 24-6 of the Maple Grove Code of <br /> Ordinances reads,in part: <br /> 69 Placement of signs on right-of-way or public land. <br /> (1)No sign other than governmental signs shall be erected orplaced for any period of time within or upon any public <br /> land except as may be author'.Zed in this subsection. <br /> (2) Only governmental signs, signs for a rummage sale posted no more than 120 hours in any eight-day period and <br /> signs advertising the sale of real estate between the hours of 6.00 p.m. Friday to 6.00 a.m. Monday may be erected orplaced <br /> within any public right-of-way or easement. No nongovernmental sign shall be placed in a public right-of-way abutting <br /> private propery unless permission to place such a sign is first obtained from the owner, occupant or other person having <br /> control of the abutting private property. <br /> (3)Any sign other than governmental signs remaining on such property in excess of 120 hours in any eight-day period, <br /> orplaced for any length of time in violation of subsection (2)of this subsection, may be summany removed by the city or <br /> othergovernmental agency owning such public right-of-way or easement and, at its discretion, destroyed. <br /> Based on the feedback and direction from Council, staff will bring back this item for future discussion, <br /> including possible ordinance changes and forecasted financial and/or staffing impacts. <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT <br /> None <br /> ATTACHMENTS <br /> None <br /> N:\Public Bodies\Agenda Packets\06-03-2013\Final\x8.3 sr sign ordinance F.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.