Laserfiche WebLink
The Commission must review the signage amendment for its consistency with the sign package <br /> established for the shopping center;does it continue to uphold and compliment the architectural <br /> character of the shopping center. In the review of the proposal,which suggested a significant departure <br /> from the clear regulations of the agreement, staff could only conclude that the signage did not support <br /> the purpose of the PUD and the amendment must be revised or denied. <br /> Alternatively, the Commission could table discussion and action on the item, allowing the applicant to <br /> review their application to be more in line with the purpose and intent of the shopping center. <br /> Financial Impact <br /> None <br /> Attachments <br /> • Location Map <br /> • Applicants Narrative <br /> • Comment Letter dated June 26, 2014 (Install This Sign &Awning Co.) <br /> • Comment Letter dated July 10, 2014 (Hilton Displays) <br /> • Sign Package Drawings <br /> • PUD Development standards <br /> N\Departments\Community Deg elopment\Planning\Case Piles\CUP\CU 14-15 Starbucks\CU 14-15 sr Starbucks PC 7-22-14 Denial--Table docs <br />