Laserfiche WebLink
Memo to the Park&Recreation Commission <br /> October 6,2000 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Site Description Pros Cons Other <br /> Number <br /> 1 Holzem #1 • Site has no • Too far from <br /> (County 12 & trees trunk lines <br /> Fillmore) • Could be part • Too low <br /> of development • Poor soils <br /> dedication <br /> 2 Holzem #2 (1/4 • Higher site • Too far from <br /> mile south of topographically trunk lines <br /> County Road • Site has no • Conflict with <br /> 12, west side of trees County tile <br /> property system <br /> 3 NE Corner • City owned • Would require <br /> Hillside City • Near trunk loss of trees <br /> Park lines (acre or more) <br /> • Easily • Impact to <br /> accessible adjacent <br /> • Shorter tower residences <br /> required • Sloped <br /> 4 NE Corner of • Adjacent to • Requires <br /> Trott Brook open area in purchase of <br /> Park (in park for staging residential lot <br /> development) • Near trunk lines from developer <br /> • Accessible • Impact to trees in <br /> park <br /> • Future impact to <br /> residences <br /> 5 NW Corner of • Adjacent to • Located in park <br /> Trott Brook open area in • Close to park <br /> Park (in park) park for staging facilities <br /> • Buffered from • Higher <br /> residences by probability of <br /> wetland and graffiti <br /> park amenities • In middle of <br /> • Near trunk lines housing <br /> 6 SE Corner of • Not in park • Site too low <br /> Tyler & County • Near trunk lines • Requires <br /> Road 12 acquisition of <br /> residence <br /> While staff originally opposed the location of the tower in Trott Brook Park, there are <br /> some merits of the proposal to consider: <br /> 11 <br />