My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.0. PRSR INFORMATION 07-12-2000
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
1993-2000
>
2000
>
07-12-2000
>
10.0. PRSR INFORMATION 07-12-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2014 2:57:57 PM
Creation date
7/23/2014 2:57:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRSR
date
7/12/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•City of Item #4.1 . <br /> � River E lk MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Mayor and Council <br /> FROM: Pat Klaers, City Administrator <br /> DATE: June 26, 2000 <br /> SUBJECT: Brookstone Development <br /> On Tuesday, June 20, 2000, Finance Director Lori Johnson and I met with <br /> Rick Martens, president of Brookstone Inc., regarding their financial <br /> obligations for the business park project. The issues discussed included park <br /> dedication fees, surface water management (SWM) fees, and the possible <br /> payment of these fees over time. <br /> Based on the discussion of City Council at its last meeting, I believe I heard <br /> the majority indicate that a compromise on at least the park dedication fee <br /> amount was appropriate and that payment of the fees over time was <br /> acceptable. The Park and Recreation Commissioners' strong feelings regarding <br /> the full payment of park dedication fees make this a sensitive topic. It is very <br /> important for the city to keep the volunteer Park and Recreation <br /> Commissioners enthusiastic about enhancing the park system. <br /> From the staff point of view, full collection of the SWM fee at the time of <br /> platting is very important. The reasoning for this position is that this is an <br /> existing fee and an error was made in documenting the amount of the fee. <br /> Accordingly, if the fee is reduced, or allowed to be paid over time, a clear <br /> precedent would be established. On the other hand, the park dedication fee for <br /> industrial/business park properties is new and this preliminary plat was done <br /> prior to the fee being established. Evidently clear information on this fee was <br /> not provided to the developer in a timely fashion. In fact, if the developers had <br /> been present when the council considered this new fee, they may have been <br /> successful in obtaining some concessions from the city. Nonetheless, we will <br /> not have this type of situation again, so I don't believe allowing a reduced fee <br /> or payment over time for the park dedication obligation will set a precedent. <br /> 13065 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 490 • Elk River, MN 55330 • TDD & Phone: (612) 441-7420 • Fax: (612)441-7425 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.