My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.0. PRSR 01-12-2000
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
1993-2000
>
2000
>
01-12-2000
>
3.0. PRSR 01-12-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2014 3:48:16 PM
Creation date
7/21/2014 3:48:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRSR
date
1/12/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Park&Recreation Commission Minutes <br /> January 12,2000 <br /> Page 3 <br /> • redundant, since Orono Park is nearby. He felt that the playground equipment at <br /> Lake Orono needs to be upgraded. <br /> John Burkness, 18194 Hudson Lane, supported the walkways but not having <br /> picnic areas. <br /> Corey Peavy, 13323 182nd Lane, stated that nearly every home on her block has <br /> small children and she did not feel the residents want a trail behind their homes. <br /> Ms. Peavy stated that since Orono Park is close, a park is not needed. She stated <br /> that deer still walk through the area and she would like to see the park kept <br /> natural. <br /> At Cannon, 13363 182nd Lane, asked if his taxes would go down if the park was <br /> developed, since he now pays higher taxes for being adjacent to the open <br /> space. Ms. McPherson suggested that Mr. Cannon contact the Sherburne <br /> County Assessor's Office for an answer to his question. She explained that if his <br /> taxes are higher, it is likely because he is adjacent to property that cannot be <br /> developed, and whether it is left wild or is more formally defined as a park will <br /> probably not make any difference. Mr. Cannon questioned what will happen to <br /> the wildlife. Mr. Wensman stated that the wildlife habitat will actually be <br /> improved by what is proposed. Mr. Cannon stated that he likes his privacy and <br /> felt that the path will bring people to the park. <br /> Commissioner Kuester stated that the park is public land and residents of the city <br /> other than those living next to the park have the right to enjoy use of all parks. He <br /> • noted the residents on 182nd Lane will still be able to use their property the way <br /> they currently do. <br /> Kris Lenertz, 13337 182nd Lane, did not feel a woodchip path was a good idea, <br /> since it could not be used for strollers, roller blades or bicycles. Ms. Lenertz stated <br /> that she liked the path the way it is now, a dirt path. <br /> Steve Wensman explained that in order to preserve the oak forest, the removal of <br /> the invasive species which do not belong is required. Ms. Lenertz stated she is in <br /> favor of the memorial and the trail, but she would like the trail moved to the edge <br /> of the park. She also wanted the center of the property and pathway left as it is. <br /> Steve Wensman explained that if the site is left as is, it will eventually be <br /> overgrown with undesirable brush and trees and will not be as desirable to <br /> wildlife. <br /> Christian Jasperson, 13311 182nd Lane,was concerned that having the wood chip <br /> trail would increase the use of the park and affect the privacy of the adjacent <br /> homeowners. He did not feel a park was needed in this area and suggested <br /> money be spent to make Orono Park more "user friendly". Mr. Jasperson <br /> expressed his support for the memorial. <br /> Phil Hals explained that the developer of Country Crossings wanted to build <br /> houses where the park is now located. The Park and Recreation Commission <br /> helped to negotiate the dedication of the park land by giving up a significant <br /> • amount of park fees in order to preserve the oak stand. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.