My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1 EDSR 07-21-2014
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2014-2020
>
2014
>
07-21-2014
>
6.1 EDSR 07-21-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 3:07:45 PM
Creation date
7/17/2014 3:07:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
7/21/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
hi Request for Action <br /> River <br /> To Item Number <br /> EDA Finance Committee 2.4 <br /> Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by <br /> General Business November 5,2013 Brian Beeman,Director of Economic <br /> Development <br /> Item Description Reviewed by <br /> Fourth Micro Loan Policy Jeremy Barnhart,Deputy Director,CODD <br /> Reviewed by <br /> Action Requested <br /> Consider terms for a fourth Micro Loan application policy to fill any gaps the other Micro Loan don't <br /> cover and make recommendation to the EDA. <br /> Background/Discussion <br /> The EDA has directed staff to work with the Finance Committee to draft a policy for a 4'1'Microloan.The <br /> EDA currently has approximately$403,048.33 left over from State DEED monies. DEED requires the city <br /> to use these funds separately from existing programs. It was noted a separate program could be created but <br /> be based similar to the existing microloan programs.When contacted, DEED requested first,that the city <br /> draft a policy then send it to DEED for review before the EDA approves the final draft The EDA discussed <br /> this matter at their July 15,2013 regular meeting.The following items were determined to be important to <br /> the EDA as guidelines for the Finance Committee in drafting a new policy. <br /> EDA Guidelines/Comments: <br /> • Business Retention/Relocation <br /> • Small Business Start-Ups Business Improvement Projects <br /> • Flexibility-Be open to more types of businesses <br /> • Consider non-profits <br /> • Current programs are too restrictive,open up to service related businesses,or larger type businesses. <br /> • If a forgivable loan is allowed and considered,ensure it is staggered and have more requirements over <br /> a longer time period with a portion of the loan to be forgiven each year. <br /> • Make it available to any small business that has a plan to expand regardless of their product. (i.e., <br /> PSB is bringing in more jobs than high tech industrial businesses. It would be nice to be able to <br /> give them a parking lot). <br /> • Offer to more types of businesses but as a revolving loan program rather than a one-time use. <br /> • Like idea of having it as an ongoing program. <br /> • See what Finance Committee creates that would be unique. <br /> • Rates aren't competitive&too much red tape <br /> • Make it as user friendly and flexible as possible <br /> • Consider reviewing policies from other communities for new,exciting ideas. <br /> Financial Impact <br /> o N i A E s i <br /> NATUREI <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.