Laserfiche WebLink
• development of an arterial connection would be extremely difficult. In addition, there is a <br /> lack of good origin-destination information to support development of such a facility. If <br /> this route is to be pursued any further, it is recommended that a detailed origin <br /> destination survey be completed to assess the existing traffic movements from TH 169 to <br /> TH10. <br /> 6.3. BIG LAKE COLLECTOR ROUTE ANALYSIS <br /> This special area study began as an analysis of growth and traffic issues along County <br /> Road 73 which extends north of TH 10 along the west side of Big Lake. This route primarily <br /> serves older residential neighborhoods that have been established along the west . de of <br /> Big Lake. This roadway is narrow (22 to 26 feet) with residences, docks and other .uildings <br /> in close proximity to the roadway. The City of Big Lake and Big Lake To ship have <br /> experienced significant growth in the northwest area of Big Lake. This ►.s resulted in <br /> additional traffic using this narrow route to access TH 10. Increased tra and continued <br /> expansions to the northwest have prompted many complaints by horn: owners along this <br /> route. Their primary concerns are the increased traffic volumes, sp-, :, safety and loss of <br /> local street (lake lot) character. Based on the close proximity of hou s and the lake, it would <br /> be difficult to improve County Road 73 (i.e., widening to improv: afety) without significant <br /> impacts. There is some urgency for addressing this issue becau- of future developments that <br /> are likely to occur in the area that could limit potential ahem. - routes. <br /> • The g roadway system analysis of the area involved examination of the e •. in roadwa s stem to determine if <br /> Y <br /> County Road 73 could be downgraded in import. ' to discourage through traffic, and if <br /> other routes could be improved to serve as the mary collector route for the area. The <br /> analysis involved a review of functional clas • ication, land use and growth trends, field <br /> review of the area, and discussion of optio, with the City, County and Mn/DOT. The <br /> findings and recommendations are as folio <br /> • County Road 81 and 200th Stre> ntersection <br /> It is recommended that a lo -term plan be developed to connect these two routes at a <br /> single intersection with T• 10. This would eliminate the short jogs on TH 10 being <br /> made between these two •utes. <br /> • Arterial Realign II • it Concept-Concept 1 <br /> This concept ould realign TH 25 north of Monticello following the 200th Street <br /> alignment to onnect to TH 10 (see Figure 14). This route would then bypass Big Lake <br /> and remo some of the heavy turning movement problems associated with commercial <br /> develo ents at the corner of TH 10 and existing TH 25. It is recommended that <br /> additional consideration be given to realigning CSAH 5 from north of Big Lake to <br /> connect with TH 25 at this intersection with TH 10. A significant portion of the new <br /> • <br /> Sherburne County Transportation Plan <br /> 50 <br />