Laserfiche WebLink
WHITE DOVE APPRAISALS , <br /> LAND APPRAISAL REPORT File No.01428 <br /> Census Tract 0305 LENDER DISCRETIONARY USE <br /> Property Address XXXX Monroe Street Sale Price $ <br /> City Elk River County Sherburne State MN Zip Code 55330 Date <br /> Legal Description See Attached Map Reference 20, 1A Mortgage Amount $ <br /> Owi upant John&Rose Hansen <br /> Sal $ Date of Sale Property Rights Appraised Mortgage Type <br /> ❑ Fee Simple Discount Points and Other Concessions <br /> Loan charges/concessions to be paid by seller$ ❑ Leashold Paid by Seller $ <br /> R.E.Taxes$ 143.49 Tax Year 2001 HOA$/Mo. -- ❑ <br /> Condominium(HUDNA) <br /> Lender/Client City of Elk River n PUD Source <br /> LOCATION Orono Parkway, Elk River, MN 55330 U Suburban (X, Rural <br /> Urban NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS rood Avg. Far Poor <br /> BUILT 0 Over 75% © 25-75% ❑ Under 25% Employment Stability ❑ © ❑ ❑ <br /> GROWTH TP ❑ Slow Convenience to Employment ❑ © n n <br /> GROVYfH RATE ❑ Rapid ❑X Stable <br /> X Increasing ❑ Stable ❑ Declining Convenience to Shopping n © ❑ ❑ <br /> DEMAND/SUPPLY VALUES ❑ g ❑ Over Supply Convenience to Schools <br /> DEMANDI8UPPLY ❑ Shortage r❑X11 In Balance po ❑ © ❑ ❑ <br /> MARKETING TIME n Under 3 Mos. rte) 3-6 Mos. n Over 6 Mos. Adequacy of Public Transportation ❑ © CI ❑ <br /> PRESENT LAND USE% LAND USE CHANGE PREDOMINANT SNGLEFAMLYHOUSNG Recreation Facilities ❑ © ❑ ❑ <br /> Single Family 35%Not Likely © OCCUPANCY PRICE AGE Adequacy of Facilities ❑ O ❑ ❑ <br /> Likely ❑ Owner © $(000) (yrs) Property Compatibility <br /> ? Multi-Family Family ly 100 Low New Protection from Detrimental Cond. O X ❑ ❑ <br /> ; Multi-Fam In process ❑ Tenant Cl <br /> Commercial To: Vacant(0-5%) © 400 High 50+ Police&Fire Protection ❑ © ❑ ❑ <br /> T Vacant(over 5%) ❑ Predominant General Appearance of Properties <br /> Industrial 150- 15 Appeal to Market n RI-1n <br /> Vacant 65% p The subject is located in the northeast <br /> Note:Race or the racial composition of the neighborhood are not considered reliable appraisal factors. COMMENTS <br /> part of the city of Elk River, a community of about 17,000 on U S Highway 10&169 approximately 30 miles northwest of the Minneapolis <br /> metro area. Adequate shopping and services can be found in the city of Elk River. <br /> Topography Rolling and wooded <br /> Dimensions See Sketch Size Typical for Area <br /> Site Area 70 Acres Corner Lot No <br /> Zoning Compliance In Compliance Shape Irregular <br /> Zoning Classification Agricultural g A ears Ade uate, ditched <br /> t ST&BEST USE: Present Use X Other Use Drainage pP q <br /> TIES Public , Other SITE IMPROVEMENTS Type Public Private View <br /> Typical, Pond <br /> In Street Street Gravel ❑X❑ O Landscaping None <br /> w Electricity ❑ Driveway None <br /> N Gas ❑ CurblGutter None <br /> ❑ Sidewalk None ❑ ❑ Apparent Easements • None <br /> Sa <br /> nitary anit ary Sewer ❑ Street Lights None ❑ ❑ FEMA Rood Hazard Yes*X No <br /> Storm Sewer <br /> S <br /> n .Alley None n" n FEMA'Map/Zone 270436-0010-D, Zone AE <br /> Comments(Apparent adverse easements,encroachments,special assessments,slide areas,etc.): Muc of the area is located in the flood zone, however all <br /> of the area is not mapped by FEMA The site consists of a small pond surrounded by low land and some higher ridges. The area has <br /> been ditched for drainage. <br /> The undersigned has recited three recent sales of properties most similiar and proximate to subject and has considered these in the market analysis. The description includes a dollar <br /> adjustment, r to significant variation between subject properties. significant <br /> t property superior <br /> to, or favorable than, the subjectproperty, a minus(-)adjustment is made, thus reducing the indicated value ofsbject f if a significant item In the comparableisinferiorto, <br /> or leas favorable than, the subject property,a plus(+)adjustment is made,thus Increasing the indicated value of the subject. <br /> COMPARABLE NO.2 COMPARABLE NO.3 <br /> ITEM SUBJECT COMPARABLE N0.1 ��County Road#5 XXXX FresnoStreet <br /> XXXX Monroe St XXXX 96th Street Elk River <br /> Address Elk River Zimmerman Big Lake <br /> 2 miles Northeast 10 miles Southeast 3 miles Northwest <br /> Proximity a Subject 430,000 $ 435,000 $ 685,560 <br /> `'� Sales Price $ $ 5,7131A <br /> Price/Acre $ I t $ 10,7500 $ 11,4410 $ <br /> County Records <br /> Data Source Inspection County Records County Records DESCRIPTION K>bnajesmxmt <br /> = VALUE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION +(-)sndi�ent DESCRIPTION ,{-)$Adpxdmeod Cony--0 pts F.)) Sales or Financing Cony--0 pts — Cony—0 pts • <br /> a Concessions -- 5/09/2001 - 9/12/2001 "' <br /> a Date of Sale/lime --- 4/26/2001 <br /> o — E•ual -- E•ual — <br /> Location Rural E•ual � __ 38 Acres -- 120 acres "' <br /> N Sitelvew 70 Acres Pond 40 Acres - -1,144 Equal '— <br /> 'ooded/Open 10%Wooded Superior -105 Superior <br /> Jw/High Land Mostly Low Superior <br /> -2,150 Superior -1,144 Equal <br /> Net Adj.(total) <br /> (-I+ QX - is 1 2,255 n+ ©- '$ 1 2,288 �X]+ n- '$ 0 Indicated Value Gross: 21.0 Gross: 20.0 Gross: 0.0 5,713 <br /> of Subject <br /> Net: -21.0 I$ 8,495 Net: -20.01$ 9,153 Net: 0.0 $ <br /> Comments of Sales Comparison: Due to the rural nature of the area, it was necessary to select comps that were greater than one mile from the <br /> subject. However, all were in the same market area.The market indicates a value of$7,800 per acre. <br /> Comments and Conditions of Appraisal: Please note the soils map included in this report.The areas highlighted(346,540,1288 )are areas that <br /> are low and marsh lands.These areas are ditched to control drainage but are still limited for usage. <br /> z Final Reconciliation: The sales comparison approach best indicates the value of the subject and was weighed the most in the final <br /> odetermination of value.The 70 acres valued at$7,800 per acre=$546,000. <br /> a 546,000 <br /> o I(WE)ESTIMATE THE MARKET VALUE,AS DEFINED,OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS OF November 13, 2001 to be$ <br /> p I(We)certify: that to the best of my(our)knowledge and belief,the facts and data used herein are true and correct;that I(we)personally inspected the subject property <br /> w and inspe r II comparable sales cited in this report;and that I(we)have no undisclosed interest,present or prospective therein. <br /> w <br /> s / Review Appraiser ❑Did ❑ Did Not <br /> Appraiser(s) ._. t✓. Inspect Property <br /> ern/ '. ith (if applicable) <br /> PrgxietayLard • r...Certified Residential Appraiser Produced using Polaroid Digital Sdulonsw&were,800234.8727 rma.polaroidtamawm <br /> White Dove Appraisal <br />