Laserfiche WebLink
content neutral and could not qualify as a valid time, place, or manner restriction on <br />protected speech. <br /> <br /> In order for a city to remove some signs and not others, it would need to <br />distinguish between the types of signs in a way that established a "reasonable fit" <br />between the signs it chose to'remove and its goal in removing the signs. The policy does <br />not have to be the "least-restrictive-means" of achieving the City's objective, but it does <br />have to be "carefully calculated" to balance the costs and benefits associated with the <br />burden on speech. The City.of Cincinnati case seems to imply that a content neutral <br />policy based on the size, shape, appearance, placement or number of signs may pass the <br />"reasonable fit" test. <br /> <br />GP:811857 vl <br /> <br /> <br />