My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.2. SR 05-19-2014
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2014
>
05-19-2014
>
8.2. SR 05-19-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2014 2:46:12 PM
Creation date
5/16/2014 8:30:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/19/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 6: Transportation / 65 <br />Elk River Comprehensive Plan <br />of existing collector or arterial roadways or include <br />construction of new routes as development <br />occurs. Much of this proposed collector network <br />was identifi ed as part of the US 10, US 169, the <br />Mississippi Connections Redevelopment Framework, <br />and 171st Avenue Focused Area studies. <br />Implementation <br />In order to implement changes that require <br />construction of new routes or segments of routes, it <br />is recommended that proactive efforts be undertaken <br />by the City in order to preserve the right of way that <br />is needed rather than building segments of roadways <br />as property develops. Waiting until development and/ <br />or redevelopment occurs does not protect the route, it <br />can lead to increased acquisition costs and it may not <br />occur in the correct timeframe. Things the City can <br />do to preserve the routes: <br /> ·Complete a corridor study to identify the preferred <br />alignment and location of the route <br /> ·Adopt an offi cial map <br /> ·Advance purchase the right of way needed <br />It is important to coordinate these efforts with <br />MnDOT and Sherburne County if the efforts impact <br />county or state routes to ensure that an alignment <br />can be identifi ed that serves the transportation need, <br />minimizes impacts to existing development (regardless <br />of use), and has the support of the required agencies. <br />It also provides an opportunity to pool funding <br />resources. <br />If proactive elements are not completed in time and a <br />development does come along, it is important for the <br />City to include the locations of potential connections <br />as part of discussions with property owners and <br />developers prior to them submitting an offi cial <br />application for approval. <br />Summary of Roadway Improvements <br />and Changes <br />The previous sections highlighted a number of <br />roadway network changes and improvements. <br />Figure 6-11 shows all of the proposed changes <br />graphically. Some of the proposed changes, such as <br />the connection between Proctor and Upland Avenues <br />along the School Street alignment will not be made <br />unless or until requested by the affected property <br />owner. <br />Traffi c Diversion and Continuous <br />Routes (arterials and collectors) <br />The lack of continuous north-south and east-west <br />collector and arterial routes creates connectivity <br />problems and results in congestion on the limited <br />number of continuous routes that do exist. At times <br />this results in traffi c using county and local streets <br />to get to destinations that could be better served by <br />having additional continuous routes. Implementation <br />of improvements to US 169 and US 10 (along with <br />associated frontage and backage roads) will help <br />provide some of the connectivity that is currently <br />lacking. However, these improvements are not <br />programmed for the near future, so additional <br />connections are needed. <br />Figure 6-10: Future Functional Classifi cation shows <br />the proposed future functional classifi cation map <br />for the City of Elk River. This map includes facility <br />upgrades to collector and arterial routes on county <br />roadways identifi ed by Sherburne County as part of its <br />long-term transportation plan. Some of the changes in <br />functional classifi cation include constructing additional <br />roadways (shown as dashed lines) or segments of <br />roadways. It should be noted that the proposed routes <br />shown on the map are conceptual only. Discussions <br />between the city and county will occur prior to <br />any new roadway construction. As part of these <br />discussions, the city and county will identify ways to <br />minimize impacts to existing residential and park uses. <br />Other changes over time may include additional <br />investments such as roadway widening (on minor <br />arterials), pedestrian and bicycle facilities, limiting <br />driveway access for newly constructed segments, <br />consolidating driveway access when redevelopment <br />occurs, etc. <br />In addition to changes on the county network, there <br />are also classifi cation changes recommended for <br />collector roadways on the city system. Most of <br />the proposed collector roadways are a continuation
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.