My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.3. SR 02-23-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
02/23/2004
>
5.3. SR 02-23-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:26 AM
Creation date
3/5/2004 3:04:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/23/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />Regular meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br />February 10, 2004 <br /> <br />5.2 Review Elk River Park Commission Request <br /> <br /> Michele McPherson, Director of Planning for the City of Elk River appeared to explain the <br />request for the ERMU to share in the cost of maintenance for the prairie plantings at Royal Valley Park. <br />John Dietz stated that he feels prairie grass is an amenity, and that an outside firm should not be hired to care <br />for the project, and that it should be maintained by City employees. Jerry Takle asked why the Utilities <br />should participate in the maintenance. Ms McPherson explained the particular care needed for the <br />maintenance of prairie plantings. Bryan asked if Phil Hals, of the City of Elk River had offered to do the <br />maintenance of the Royal Valley Park. Ms McPherson responded that Phil had offered, but the Park <br />Commission is of the opinion that an outside finn would be more qualified to care for the prairie plantings. <br />John Dietz asked if the Well had not been installed at that site, would prairie plantings have been considered, <br />and Ms McPherson replied that she did not believe so. John Dietz stated that he thinks the Utilities has done <br />more than their share of restoration of the site, and should not pay for maintenance. Jerry Takle believes that <br />Utilities customers should not pay for maintenance of the park. Ms McPherson thanked the Commission for <br />their consideration, and noted that she would advise the Park Commission of the Elk River Municipal <br />Utilities refusal to participate in the maintenance at Royal Valley Park. <br /> <br />5.3 Review & Consider Pick-up Truck Bid~ <br /> <br /> Bryan Adams explained the 2004 budget item for the purchase of two pick-up trucks. John Dietz asked <br />who would be driving the trucks, and their purpose. Bryan Adams reviewed the vehicle needs of outside <br />employees in conjunction with their duties. Commission, and Staff discussed the bids received for the <br />vehicles. <br /> <br /> Jerry Takle moved to accept the local bid from Elk River Ford for two Ford pick-ups. John Dietz <br />seconded the motion. Motion carried 2-0. <br /> <br />5.4 Review Wholesale Electric Rate FERC Action <br /> <br /> Bryan Adams explained the wholesale electric rate structure, and the document filed with the Federal <br />Energy Regulatory Commission. A short discussion followed. No action necessary. <br /> <br />6.1 Review 2003 Annual Report <br /> <br />Staff presented the Annual Report to City Council to the Commission, and asked for comments with any <br />additions or deletions. After a short review Bryan Adams thanked the Commission for their support of the <br />Utilities staff. He further noted that the Utility is stressing vision, and projections. The MMUA rate study of <br />municipal utilities was presented to Commission, with explanations of the ERMU place in the study. The <br />connection fees were discussed, with the understanding that developing areas are the driving force behind <br />the fees. No action necessary; receive and file. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.