My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.1. SR 02-09-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
02/09/2004 - SPECIAL
>
2.1. SR 02-09-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:26 AM
Creation date
3/5/2004 2:16:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/9/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes Page 4 <br />February 9, 2004 <br /> <br />4.7 Consider Voluntary Insurance Quote from League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust <br /> <br />Finance Director Lori Johnson explained that the City had received a quote for accident <br />coverage for city volunteers through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. The <br />City currently purchases a separate worker's compensation insurance policy for board and <br />commission members. Volunteers who respond to emergency situations are automatically <br />covered under the City's workers' compensation insurance. However, this policy would <br />insure volunteers who are not covered by workers' compensation insurance, such as <br />volunteers for park and recreation, clean-up day, or other city activities and programs. The <br />premium for basic coverage for one year is $1,500 with an optional $675 per year for medical <br />benefit coverage. <br /> <br />Councilrnember Motin asked how many incidents have we had in the last five years. Ms. <br />Johnson replied that there have not been any incidents with volunteers. <br /> <br />MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOTIN AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILMEMBER TVEITE TO APPROVE THE $1,500 PREMIUM FOR <br />BASIC COVERAGE. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />4.8 Consider Hiring Building Inspector <br /> <br />Building and Environmental Administrator Stephen Rohlf explained that City staff had <br />interviewed three of the 39 applicants for the vacant position of building inspector. Those <br />involved in the interviews were unanimous in their recommendation to hire Dave Hetrick to <br />f~ this position with the recommendations as outlined in the memo from staff. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dietz asked Ms. Johnson her viewpoint on the additional $3000 as an <br />annual increase. She gave the background of how this came about and expressed some <br />concerns about comparable worth and pay equity law. She indicated that the Council has <br />several options including leaving the additional pay for building inspectors in place or begin <br />phasing it out by paying new inspectors according to the pay plan <br /> <br />Councilmember Motin inquired as to the impact of the comparable worth issues and staying <br />in compliance. <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson explained that according to the pay equity laws, compliance reports have to be <br />submitted to the State every five years now instead of every three years. She further stated <br />that an increase in pay for this classification could put the City out of compliance, but she <br />~vas not sure because the current pay data had not been analyzed and because the actual <br />compliance would be based on the data as it existed on the next reporting date which is <br />December 31 of 2004 or 2005. If the City is out of compliance, penalties may be assessed. <br />She stated that the Personnel Committee has been directed to do a salary survey and will be <br />looking at building inspector pay including the market adjustment. <br /> <br />Building and Environmental Administrator Steve Rohlf explained that the salary studies <br />sho~v that the City of Elk River is above for Group 6. However, it is hard to do <br />comparisons. Some in this group are code enforcement officers which are not the same as <br />building officials. Each step and each position for building inspectors was given an <br />additional $3000 to retain the inspectors when other inspectors were being hired at St. <br />Michael. He stated that East Bethel is actually earning more because their employees are <br />given 3% in deferred comp; so when asking for a salary survey, it is not a true evaluation. <br />He suggested that perhaps it's necessary to re-look at the study and rather than lo~ver the <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.