7.4. SR 04-21-2014 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

C'�ty of "f Request for Action Piver Item Number Planning Corricrtission 15.1 Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by Planning Items April 8, 2014 Chris Leesebcrg, Park Planner- Planner Item Description Reviewed by Request by juanita Glenn on behalf of Wapiti Park Jeremy Barnhart, Deputy Director, CODD for an Interim Use Permit to utilize existing Reviewed by building for store building---- 18746 'Froy St. NW, peter Beck, (',Ity ,Attorney Case No. CU 14-08 — Public Hearing, continued from March 11, 2014 Action Requested Deny, by motion, apPrOjTal of the Interim Use Permit for the following reasons: 1. The applicant has failed to provide documentation that the on-site septic system.,, at Wapiti Park have been inspected and certified to be 1.11 compliance with state statutes and administrative rules. 2. The applicant has failed to provide updated site plans showing that the driving and parking areas for the store building will be defined by concrete curb and gutter as required by Section 30-901 of the City Code. Background/Discussion The Wapiti Park Campground (Campground) is located entirely within the Ciq,'s Shorcland Management Overlay Zoning District. Because the Campground is located in this district, the septic systcrris serving the campground must ti-icet the current requirements of Minnesota Statutes and IMPCA regulations, before a permit of any type may be approved for use of the property. This includes the Interim Use Permit for the store building. An analysis of the applicable regulations and their impact on the Campground is included in the attached letter form the City Attorney to the Campgrounds attorney, dated March 14, 2014. Pursuant to the applicable statutes and regulations, the septic systerris serving,, the Campground must be inspected and certified to be in compliance with state, statutes and administrative rules before the Interim. Use Permit can be apptovcd. The City A.ttorney's letter outlined a process for how the applicant could extend the time period for consideration of the Interim Use permit application if they did not have enough time to provide inspection and certification documentation for the April 8, 2014 planning Cottirni'ssion meeting. The applicant has not provided any documentation that the septic systems have been inspected and certified to be in compliance with 'Minnesota Statutes and administrative rules, and has not submitted a written request to extend the time for Planning Commission review and City Council action on the Interim Use permit application. Because of this, an Interim Use permit inay not be approved and the Planning Commission should reconitnend denial of the Interii-i-i Use Permit to the City Council. Financial Impact None P 0 0 1 R 1 0 0 V NATURE