My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.6 PCSR 03-11-2014
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2014
>
03-11-2014
>
7.6 PCSR 03-11-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2014 3:17:51 PM
Creation date
3/7/2014 2:50:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
3/11/2014
case
LU 14-01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River Comp ehensive Plan <br /> l ` <br /> j <br /> �►-- �,+„�,� Redevelopment <br /> ' The City should explore more aggressively the <br /> _ practice of redevelopment. Redevelopment does <br /> not need to be the top down practice of relocating <br /> _ neighborhoods and businesses to other areas so <br /> -` - that new development can move in. Redevelopment <br /> should be the stated and practiced posture of the <br /> community to allow for and promote the reuse of <br /> substandard parcels to achieve the vision of the <br /> community. <br /> " Redevelopment has many benefits, including <br /> increased jobs, tax base, and employment options <br /> within existing infrastructure, improving streetscape <br /> and community image blight, and improved pedestrian <br /> and vehicular connections. Even with these benefits, <br /> redevelopment is more costly and time consuming <br /> than greenfield development. The City should seek to <br /> remove obstacles to redevelopment, such that it is as <br /> attractive to new development as greenfield sites in <br /> neighboring communities. <br /> 42 / Chapter 5: Land Use <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.