6.3.- 6.6. SR 02-09-2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mayor ~%anzmg opened the ?ubEc xearmg :-or both the Land _:se Amendment and thc Tone Chan~e. Jay Johnson, 555 3~ Sa:eec-Stared :hat he [s represenrin~ Dennis Anderson, the owner of the proper~. Re stated that the covenants had an e=or ze~ardn~ Oudo~ A and ~. Anderson ~venr to ~s~cr court to ~x the error. Me stored that the ~s~{cr court ordered x }ud~nenr sraffn~ clsnf/tn~ char Ouflor A[s nor considered res~den~al. >~. Johnson re:~d x letter dared September L094 to rhe ci~,~ that stored Hh~h,,vav Bossiness, Commercial, t~nd Rera~ were planned lot th~s Ou~or when there is a need {or this development. ~. Johnson stored that there ~s a need for co~erma[ develo?ment in Elk ~ver. Tom H:tlbald,:en, [[74.4 L9¢~t, Avenue-Stated d~at this [s nor. good planning and he is opposed ro ~he rezonin~. Scott Frasier, [ [678 208~' Avenue-Stated that ixe is concerned with the ecol%7 of dxe area, traffic, and am' quality. He stared that the ?roperT? ~vas Grinnell? proposed to be a park and should remain a park. Leanne Brown, 19737 Lowell Street-Stated she ',vas told the proper~ was ~o be a park. She is concerned abotzr traf~c, noise, proper7/values, and d2e cRrninished quali~ oS nature. She stated rear she would prefer to have tl~e zoning changed ~o PUD. John Polden, [ 1751 [96~h Avenue-Stated he wouid prefer a PUD zone change over a HJghwa? Commercial zone change, as he felt residents would have more involvement with dxe ~pe of businesses ro develop on the property. He is concerned with noise, ~xe safety of dxe Solid Rock Church school children, and cra-ne. Barb Buhl, 11808 Bren~vood Lane-Scared concerns regarding noise and increased r. raf~c in ~e neighborhood. Gaff )mderson, 19411 Irving C~cie-Stated concerns about traffic and ~vhat the A~mre plans of ~N/DOT may be for instalimg overpasses and service roads in ~e area. Carol Bergquist, 19'140 Hok Street-Stated concerns about jake-braking and the headlights from vehicles on H_ighwa7 [69. She is al,so concerned about property values. She stated that she was roid ~he subject property would be residenuM. Steve Brown, 1.9737 Lowell S~:eet-Stated that he doesn't want ro see ELk Raver become a Maple Grove. Dale Duitsma, [ [,349 [$4m Avenue-Stated he was told d~e subject p~u:cel would be residenuaL He is concerned about property, v~ues and noise. Gary. Kleis, [9815 irving Avenue-Stated that the developer should abide by the covenants. He is concerned about traffic, accidents, and speed. Fie ff~rrher stared dear E~ River is losing some ,or' irs character due ~o ~11 the devebpmenr. Ted Tray[ca, L9702 irving Street-Stated he was r. oid the subject parcel ,.vas zoned residential He is concerned wifi~ a:af~c ~nd speed. He stared d~ar he or>poses, *~he re,~omng" ' but would pre£er a PUD zone change over a H/gix~vay Commercial zone change.