My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.3.- 6.6. SR 02-09-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
02/09/2004 - SPECIAL
>
6.3.- 6.6. SR 02-09-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:25 AM
Creation date
2/23/2004 7:46:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/9/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes <br />January 27, 2004 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />and signage. She noted that a lighting plan needs to be provided and a revised tree <br />preservation plan to reflect the trees that actually will be saved should be submitted. <br /> <br />The applicant will be required to obtain the necessary wetland permits for the two small <br />wedands prior to commencing grading. The drainage plan consists of 2 ponds which will <br />hold back-to-back 100-year rainfall events and one pond which outlets under Highway 169. <br />Ms. McPherson noted that the applicant needs to revise the drainage calculations as <br />addressed in the City Engineer's memo. Also, a maintenance plan must be submitted <br />regarding infiltration rates for the ponds and how the rate will be maintained in the future. <br /> <br />Ms. McPherson explained that staff met with MnDOT on January 12, 2004 and that <br />MnDOT is interested in moving the Highway 169 Study to the next level. An <br />Environmental Impact Study (EIS) will need to be completed and a decision made as to <br />which properties will need to be acquired. She noted that the study may include all of <br />Highway 169 from the Mississippi River (Highway 101) up to Princeton. Currendy, <br />MnDOT is drafting a Scope of Services and proposes to hire a consultant in late fall of 2004. <br />She noted that the EIS will likely take up to two years to complete, and only then could <br />MnDOT or the City begin the process of acquiring property. She noted that the City has no <br />money budgeted for property acquisition. Ms. McPherson stated that these steps need to <br />occur so that if and when money should become available for MnDOT to do a project, they <br />and the City will be prepared. <br /> <br />Ms. McPherson explained that preliminary plat consists of 7 lots ranging in size from 1.02 <br />acres to 3.73 acres. Hok Street will function as a service road along Highway 169 and will <br />connect with the existing Hok Street at 194th Avenue and be extended to intersect with 197th <br />Avenue. She noted that the Park and Recreation Commission recommended cash for the <br />park dedication requirement. <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of the requests by Morcon based on the findings and conditions <br />listed in the staff report. <br /> <br />Chair Pederson opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />John Polden, 11751 196th Avenue, stated that he was told by a MnDOT representative that <br />they plan to construct a underpass or overpass at Main Street in two years, and one at 197th <br />Avenue in 1 - 5 years. Chair Pederson stated that based on Ms. McPherson's meeting with <br />MnDOT in January, that is not the case. Mr. Polden expressed his concern that the <br />proposed development will bring people into the residential neighborhood that would not <br />otherwise travel through it. He stated that he was concerned about the ponds. <br /> <br />Leanne Brown, 19737 Lowell, expressed her opposition to the proposed development. <br />She stated that she did not receive the notices of meetings. Mr. Pertl stated that even though <br />she did not receive a mailed notice, she was in attendance at all the meetings and that they <br />have listened to her comments. Ms. Brown stated that she did not feel Elk River needed any <br />more Class II or small restaurants and that Elk River residents are looking for something <br />different. She stated that she did not see any difference between this development and Elk <br />Park Center. <br /> <br />Tom Halbakken, 11744 194th Avenue, stated that he was concerned about traffic and that <br />it is difficult now to get in and out of the neighborhood. He did not feel there were enough <br />streets to accommodate the traffic and that the sharp mm by the bank onto 197th Avenue <br />was not acceptable. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.