My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.3.- 6.6. SR 02-09-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
02/09/2004 - SPECIAL
>
6.3.- 6.6. SR 02-09-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:25 AM
Creation date
2/23/2004 7:46:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/9/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ch'~ Csur-cil Meeting <br /> <br />u'nu~bc] cJ:e. :ne fb~her JndiccteC thc: accortina ~c c cjvencnt for ~he <br />c e,/eic preen t. <br /> <br />C, ounciimem~er .:':rDer sc, aka <zf the concern regarding fha imoac: i'rcffic ',vault <br />move in the 8renr,,,cod ,:rea if the prccecv ,,,,'ere rezcnea ior ccmmer£iol use. <br />Counciimem~er ,:crier indicated thor he cie noi feel that crec ,,vcrronfed <br />commerc:c!ceveiocment. HeinaiccTeCnewcz s~Dosec to rherecuest. <br /> <br />Counciimemoer -c~mgren :poke cc, out the eec!son of the Council :o nor want <br />commerc:cl aeveiecment to the west of the CiV cue fo the Susnes: P:zrk and <br />further indiccte~ m, at there i: no :ewer ,Jnc we:er to :he .east of :he City clang <br />Highwc,/ ]0. He indco;e~ this leaves only Highwo/ 169 ~er commereic~ <br />deveicpment ct the present time. He-~-*~ he fop <br /> ~,u ..... thi: [::ue :~ouid go Dock to <br />the Planning Commisson for review Grid further stated that he was not convinced <br />that OuTlet A should only be developed os residential <br /> <br />Mayor Ouifsmcn :fated that he felt commercial deveiopment could go up fo <br />197th A~enue. He indicated that he isconcernec aboutsrotecting there:idents <br />in the arec with some type pi c Suffer from the commercial deveiooment. He <br />further indicated he Cid not feel ihot Outloi A ,,vas o residential piece pi properf/. <br /> <br />Councilmember Oietz voiced his supper' for Planning Commission members and <br />their review of this proposci. He indicated that he felt ~he City ,,vouid also be <br />receiving c request from developers on the east side of Highwc,/ 1~9 to extend <br />commercial development up to !gFth Avenue. He fur'her :to, ted that he felt <br />Outlot A. vvcs conducive ~o commercial development, however, he indicated <br />that he disagreed with the proposed concept for a Dig box retailer in that area. <br />Councitmem~er OieE stated that Elk Park Vctu Center ~s su~ounded b'/~o major <br />roads whereas this prepare/Js surrounded only by one mcpr road and residential <br />propem/. He stctea that because of that, he wouid like re see the developer <br />suemitc revised, down-sized concept. He stated that commercial development <br />will go north of I93rd A~enue in this area as the Ci~/has c :ommercicl site next to <br />Holt Avenue fhct it alerts to sell in the future. Councfimemeer Oie~ stated ~hct <br />t~ere must ~e some r'..,pe o~ buffer beP~een large commercfc~ development and <br />residential <br /> <br />The Ci,-'/ Council discussed the size of commercial building that should be <br />procosed far Outlet ,~'.. After much discu'::on, it ,~c: decided fhct there would :ce <br />ne nee~ for the Ceveioper to return to ~he P~cnning Commission with new alan:. <br />However. ~he aeve!cper :nouiC :uomit rev~sed p~cn: :o the Ci~ Council for <br />review. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER SCHEEL MOVED TO CONTINUE fTEM£ 8.£. AND 8.& TO THE JUNE :, <br />197~, C:T'f COUNCIL MEETING. COUNCILMEM,~ER HOLMGR~N SECONDED Tiie <br />M©TION. Tide MOT]ON CARRIED 3-2. C,3unc~imen':ce,~ Fcr~erand C'{e:zcoocsec. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.