?cge !0
<br />
<br />Gar/ ,qe~s, 1?a15 lr4na Avenue, Elk River, ;'~ ~,-~,s'revicu-~ ,]or:c,r~'a,, ,~, c c, co_~e,,l, to
<br />
<br />Pqui Os±mae, I?,64~ lr~ing Avenue, E:k RNer, :feTed he is c~Ccsec ho csmmerc:ci
<br />deveicomen~ in ~hCT,Crec end he Es ,cC~cse~l ~o ibis ~roiec?,
<br />
<br />O(:le Miller, li79~-1% Avenue, E!k River, iterated pre~,{ous concerns;
<br />This 2rc~osal.
<br />
<br />Ken Williams, ~7732 3Fentwccd Lone, E!k River. csmmenCeC Oenris Ander:mn ~cr
<br />~he ,:uciih,' of pre',fcu's ,srcjec~s, hcwe,,er, xe k ,ccpcsec to this b~pe of prqecf ir, c
<br />residen iici neighbornood.
<br />
<br />[:)mn Scnwcrk, 1778£ Irding Avenue, Elk River, opCoseC ~o ibis oroooscl.
<br />
<br />Phil Johnson, 19400 Holt Sffeef, Elk River, presented the Planning Commisicn with
<br />signotures of oreo residents stating the,/ were opposed
<br />Jonnson stored he is opposed iD this proposal.
<br />
<br />Doug WdefT_ko, i?~38 Ulysses 2f,, Eik River, ;hsted he is opposed to this proiecL
<br />
<br />· Rotf Anderson, 19411 I~ving Circle, Elk River, iteroted previous concerns
<br />os'xed the Ptonning Commission to toke into considerotion thor this is o residential
<br />neighborhood. Mr. Anderson continued ihct ~his [s on outlot in o residential
<br />neighborhood and ihe surrounding residents do not ',,rant commercial
<br />development in this location. Mr. Anderson is opoosec~ to this proposal.
<br />
<br />Sue Weiser, 11~?~-1~7 Avenue, Elk River, stated she is opposed to this projecL
<br />
<br />Dennis Anderson explained his request and reo:on For the zone change and land
<br />use amendment.
<br />
<br />Jeff Pelfier, 119&5-195 Circle, Elk River, cuesticned staff regarding the notice to
<br />surrounding residents. Mr. ?oilier did not ieei the 350 foot radius Es ~.ufficient in ail
<br />cases. Peter 8ack explained the notification radius is mandated by thc State.
<br />
<br />Ken Lueck, 11383-I78 Avenue, Eik River, iterated previous concerns; opposed to
<br />this ~roiect.
<br />
<br />Jenny £fone, ]9783 Lowell Street, E!k River, iteroted previous ,concerns:
<br />this ~rolecT.
<br />
<br />There being no further comments from ~he puelic, Chcirmcn Tveite closet ee
<br />,suotic hecring.
<br />
<br />COMMI££1ONER MINTON RECOMMF. NDED gENIAL OF THE LAND USE AMENr:MENT
<br />AND ZONE CHANGE REGUE~T BY ,DENNI~ ANDERSON, PUBUC HEARING, CARE NO.
<br />LUA 94-~ AND ZC 94-6, C:TiNG STAFF'S M~MO AS FINDING OF FACT. D~NIA~ 12
<br />R~COMMENDED BA. SED ON CONSIDERA~L~ P~JELJC OPPOSITION WITH THE
<br />FOLLOWING
<br />
<br />
<br />
|