|
..... r'/ ~ ,
<br />Higr, ,Sensit¥ allows u~) '; ap, c, rcximctely '~2 units per ,care.
<br />
<br />-~,cugY, iy ,.~,:'7 ,sates ore ~/acc, n; far ccmr~erc!ci jeve!c.c, menT. However, much ,of
<br />this crec dces not nave c tv vvcter ,and sewer.
<br />
<br />-An access at l?tth and Highway 1,{? is ,already in place. ;xio "new" accesses
<br /> '" ' ~ ,~ I~
<br />onto mghwc'/ ~:x ,~iil be .....
<br />
<br />-,~ oor, dificnoi ,,,se permit is ,nOT recuired et t~il~ time for coprovai of
<br />;-ez,sc,~r,~ reaL'est. Fha oonoiticnci use permit ,,~c~,iC Pe csclieC for if the
<br />was ,spcrove~; cnco specific deveiopmen~ plcn was suemitTeC.
<br />
<br />-~h,e multi-~cmily Jeveiopment moratorium
<br />wnen the
<br /> ~mpre, eh.. ?!cnisc~prc, vea.
<br />
<br />-A proper?/ owner will always have the right to petition their government for c
<br />legislative act, such os a rezoning, bio proper? owner has a right to a specific
<br />zoning. Precedent~ have vet/little affect on decisions regarding rezonings made
<br />~,/ iocal governments, as they are iegislative cats. However, quasi-iudicici
<br />actions such os conditional ~Jse permits where all conditions for approval con be
<br />met, mc'/ be somewhat affected Oy precedents. Also, ~he iact that ~ propert'/
<br />owner ma;/ be able to develop o site et a higher return with o porticuiar 'zoning,
<br />does not cive him the right to that zoning. Highest and ~est use of a particular
<br />property i~'ccnsidered in comprehensive zoning and land use decisions, but if is
<br />noi determinative in c re,zoning contest.
<br />
<br />Commissioner tv\inton expressed his agreement that the proposed use is too
<br />intense for the site. He did agree that some b'pe of commercial use may ~e best
<br />for the site, especially with proper buffering. He felt that sewer and water wilt
<br />come ~o the area eventually. He expressed his concern that the impact on
<br />trcfffio would be significant. He stateq he support'ed denial of the request and
<br />would not be in favor of considering any future requests regarding this site until
<br />the Steering Committee has ocm~leted [ts work. Commission Minton stated that
<br />he saw no o~,cflict of interes~ for Commissioner Kroger cng would encourage him
<br />to vote on this issue.
<br />
<br />Commissioner dillon state,2 that ~u~~'~ cn the information suOmitte~ <znd
<br /> ;hrougNcu the residen:icl ',vas c ,are,at ccncern
<br />discussed, ~e felt that the traffic - ~ ~
<br />
<br />cna was ~n favor of denial. He aiso was nct in favor o,f reviewing any ,more
<br />requests regarding the sueiect prc~,e~ until the S~eeric, g Committee has made
<br />their final reccmmencc~ions.
<br />
<br />Comrmis:ioner
<br />this ~zrec. S~eve ,(ch stated that c t~/'picc~ me~nod to esfimcie the num,,er o~
<br />;ncme~ ~ith ~0,000 ;quote foo~ ,z,;; ~s ~o use 3 density of ~.5 lots per zero, ~nclucing
<br />rocG~ 'sm~ :mmrcvement~; tperercre, c~crcxi~CTe!y ~ ~c~es CCUiG ~e ~uiit cn
<br />~he ]7 acre ?itc. ~cmmm:icner (roger
<br />cave,oder ~u~m~t a reviseG plan ~nccr~crcfing the !citow~ng information:
<br />
<br />-,~P, ow ~he !oc~ticn c~ homes adjacent ~o the proc, oscO c~mmercici pre!eat on
<br />
<br />
<br />
|