Laserfiche WebLink
planning cormmssion Minutes <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br /> residents, fie stated that Fie concurred with staff's recommendation to approve the [and use <br /> amendment and rezonmg. Chair Pederson noted that it will not be long until :he gravel <br /> mining to the north of Brentwood is complete and that that area is proposed for ~ndustrial <br /> development. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Lernke asked what options th~ Commission has, and whether or not the <br /> use amendment could be approved but not the rezoning. Director ot~ Planning Michele <br /> McPherson stated that the Commission needs to make a recommendation either to approve <br /> or deny :he request, and if approved by the City Council, the applicant would then submit a <br /> preliminary plat application. At that time, issues regarding screening, berming, and access <br /> would be addressed. Commissioner Lemke asked if the City would have more options it~ a <br /> Planned Unit Development (PUD) was requested. City Attorney Peter Beck explained that <br /> PUD is a zoning and that the applicant chose to request the C3 zoning. Mr. Beck noted that <br /> it has been the City's goal to keep the land use and zoning the same, but that it is not <br /> absolute to have it the same. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson stated that he feels that area should be zoned commercial but that <br />the timing of the request is 'ahead of the update of the Comprehensive Plan. Comrrsssioner <br />Anderson 'also expressed concern regarding the traffic traveling east to west. <br /> <br />A resident in the audience asked what the ne,ct step of the process would be. Director of <br />Planning Michele McPherson explained that the minutes of this meeting would be prepared <br />and presented to the City Council as part of the packet for The August 18~h City Council <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Discussion followed regarding the requirements for resubmission of an application. City <br />Attorney Peter Beck stated that it was his understanding that an applicant must wait six <br />months to resubmit the same request. Commissioner Offerman stated that he would <br />support the request if it came back as a PUD. Director of Planning Michele McPherson <br />stated that the applicant could submit a different application after the August 18th City <br />Council meeting, if this request was denied. <br /> <br />COM/VlISSIONER A~NDERSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE <br />REQUEST BY MORCON CONSTRUCTION FOR A LAND USE AMENDMENT <br />FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO HIGHWAY BUSINESS, CASE <br />NO. LU 03-02, BASED ON THE FACT THAT THE LAND USE REQUEST IS <br />NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLUg, AND <br />INFORMATION PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. <br />COMMISSIONER OFFERMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION <br />CARRIED 4-1. Chair Pederson opposed. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE <br />REQUEST BY lVIORCON CONSTRUCTION TO REZONE CERTAIN <br />PROPERTY FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO HIGI-tWAY <br />COMMERCLA_L, CASE NO. ZC 03-04 BASED ON THE DENIAL OF THE I.,~qD <br />USE ~a2MENDMENT. COMlVlISSIONER ROPP SECONDED THE MOTION. <br />THE MOTION CARRIED 4-1. Chair Pederson opposed. <br /> <br />(3.3. <br /> <br />Request bv Wash-N-Fill Properties of lVflhr, LLC to Amend the PUD Agreement for Elk <br />River Crossing, Public Heann§ - Case No. CU 03-18 <br /> <br /> <br />