Laserfiche WebLink
Budget V/orksession <br />August 12, 2002 <br /> <br />Police Liaison Program <br />The third item that needs to be discussed is the police liaison program. This issue will impact <br />the 2003 budget. <br /> <br />For years the DARE program and the juvenile liaison program were on the "cutting block" <br />whenever the school budget came up for consideration. On the other hand, the city has <br />always been interested in receiving additional funding for the services that we provide. In <br />1999 a five year agreement was approved by both the city and the school district for services <br />and funding through 2004. This agreement was subject to renegotiation if conditions (state <br />funding or student population) changed by more than 20 percent. <br /> <br />As I understand the situation, the school district has had conversations with the Sheriff and <br />the Sheriff is willing to provide juvenile and liaison services to the school district free of <br />charge. This is the same offer that was extended by the Sheriff in 1999. Recently the city has <br />been advised that unless the city provides juvenile and liaison services free of charge to the <br />school district, then the school will end its relationship with the city police department and <br />will utilize the sheriff's department and officers for juvenile and liaison services. <br /> <br />The Chief of Police and Assistant Chief of Police will be in attendance at this meeting to <br />review the situation with the City Council (Please see the attached memo from Tom <br />Zerwas). The Chief is willing to forgo the hiring of a drug task force officer that was in the <br />2002 budget and his request for a truck enforcement officer that is in the 2003 preliminary <br />budget (starting July 2003) in order to have funding available for the juvenile and liaison <br />program so that this service can be offered to the school district free of charge. This does <br />not mean that we will not see the request for a truck enforcement officer or a drug task force <br />officer in the future, it simply means that these requests for additional manpower are being <br />put off to a later date in order to free up funds to finance 100 percent of the juvenile and <br />liaison program. <br /> <br />Clearly, the offering of police liaison services at no charge to the school district is a difficult <br />issue. No one disputes the benefits to the city in deterring crime, establishing good <br />relationships with juveniles, etc., that is fostered by the liaison program, but at what price <br />should we be providing these services. The survey, which the Assistant Chief provided to the <br />School Board, indicated that only 1 of 26 cities provided liaison services at no charge. The <br />fact that the sheriff will provide these services at no charge has put the city in a difficult <br />situation. <br /> <br />2003 General Fund Revenues <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> - Draft 2003 general fund revenue projections <br /> - General fund revenues "history" page <br /> <br /> <br />