Laserfiche WebLink
Item 5 . 10 <br /> City of <br /> Elk <br /> River <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Mayor and City Council <br /> i <br /> FROM: Pat Klaers, City Adrryrwiy <br /> DATE: October 28, 2002 <br /> Budget Memo <br /> On September 9, 2002, the City Council approved the proposed maximum tax levy resolution. <br /> At this time there was a $79,100 gap between projected revenues and expenditures. Revenues <br /> were proposed at$7,653,950 and expenditures were projected at$7,733,050. Based on <br /> expenditures, the 2003 budget was projected to increase 7.17%. <br /> Prior to this September 9, 2002 meeting, the City Council had a worksession where the budget <br /> gap between revenues and expenditures was adjusted from $362,100 down to $79,100. <br /> Attached is an August 26, 2002 memo (with some hand written notes), which identifies the <br /> adjustments that were made in order to bring the 2003 budget gap down to $79,100. <br /> Since the September 9, 2002, City Council meeting, a number of issues have surfaced which <br /> impact the proposed 2003 budget. These issues are identified as follows: <br /> $79,100...9/9/02 budget gap <br /> $21,500...school liaison revenue <br /> $4,000...decrease in revenue for Police services <br /> $3,000...lower expenditure for VisionAlR service contract—Police <br /> $3,000...juvenile grant revenue reduction (received in 2002 and not in 2003) <br /> $15,000...higher recreation program expenses for leasing gymnasium space A.�,� <br /> $10,000...higher building maintenance expenditures being projected Ajo <br /> $86,600...new budget gap p <br /> -t /S ono Lgoc-r- <br /> As you can tell there has not been any progress since September 9 in closing the budget gap in <br /> spite of receiving school liaison revenues. Additionally, staff had concerns that the 2003 <br /> problem was going to get even worse as we began to analyze year-end 2002 revenue <br /> projections. In this regard, consider the following: <br />