My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9.1. SR 01-21-2014
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2014
>
01-21-2014
>
9.1. SR 01-21-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2014 3:34:42 PM
Creation date
1/16/2014 2:37:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/21/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Criteria I Governments I U.S. Public Finance: U.S. Local Governments General Obligation Ratings:Methodology <br /> And Assumptions <br /> 3. The Strength Of The General Obligation Pledge And State Level Incentives For Debt Payment <br /> 16. A general obligation pledge usually obligates a local government to use all legally available funds to pay debt service <br /> and--if such current funds are not sufficient--to take actions necessary to increase those funds. This includes an <br /> obligation to levy additional property taxes specifically for debt service, although state tax caps may limit this pledge. <br /> A limited tax pledge may affect the rating(see"Standard&Poor's Refines Its Limited-Tax GO Debt Criteria", <br /> published Jan. 10, 2002). <br /> 17. In addition, some states have laws that empower state governments to take over local governments when their <br /> financial position deteriorates significantly or to direct state-appropriated monies for debt repayment. Even temporary <br /> relief from debt payments may elude local governments if GO debt enjoys the additional benefits of dedicated taxes or <br /> other"special revenues".About one-half of states' statutes either fail to provide specific authorization for municipalities <br /> to file for bankruptcy, as currently required for a bankruptcy filing under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, or prohibit such a <br /> filing. Of the remaining 28 whose statutes authorize bankruptcy, 15 states only authorize municipal bankruptcy subject <br /> to approval or other conditions,and many states have used this approval power to intervene before a bankruptcy can <br /> occur. <br /> 18. While the nature of the GO pledge may best explain the miniscule net losses experienced on municipal debt during the <br /> Great Depression(net losses amounted to 0.4%of debt outstanding),in our view the limitations associated with <br /> Chapter 9 bankruptcy, and states'use of their additional oversight powers also contribute to the sector's extraordinarily <br /> low default rate by reducing political risk. Faced with the potential for longer-term costs of reduced market access and <br /> reputational damage for state and local officials,nonpayment of debt,in our view,makes little sense for most <br /> governments experiencing fiscal stress. <br /> 4. U.S. Local Government Payment Performance <br /> 19. Some proponents of current local government stability criticize references to local government defaults in periods such <br /> as the Great Depression or earlier. They cite changes such as lower government debt levels,improved revenue <br /> diversification, stronger state oversight, and fundamental changes to the economic and banking sectors as reasons why <br /> such previous default performance is less relevant.While the criteria recognize and incorporate many of these <br /> changes, such statements,in our view, overlook important reasons to consider past payment performance. First,given <br /> the experience of the recent recession and current economic challenges,the idea that the municipal performance seen <br /> only since World War II will continue regardless of future conditions is itself suspect. Rather than blind speculation, <br /> past performance provides observable data with which to compare and contrast different scenarios. Second,the period <br /> since World War II generally does not provide sufficient stressful periods with which to calibrate general obligation <br /> criteria(see "Understanding Standard&Poor's Rating Definitions",published June 3, 2009).Although the recent <br /> recession may demonstrate that municipal credits in general are investment grade,it provides little insight as to <br /> whether the current criteria appropriately differentiate'A', 'AA', and'AAA' credits as suggested by the article above. <br /> That evaluation requires more stressful periods. <br /> 20. Several studies provide what we consider to be good summaries of past municipal credit performance. The work most <br /> often quoted is George Hempel's"The Postwar Quality of State and Local Debt",published by the National Bureau of <br /> Economic Research(NBER)in 1971. The criteria also take Hempel's 1964 University of Michigan dissertation, "The <br /> Postwar Quality of Municipal Bonds", on which the NBER publication is based as a resource because it provides a bit <br /> WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT SEPTEMBER 12,2013 8 <br /> 1190266 1300881696 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.