My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9.1. SR 01-21-2014
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2014
>
01-21-2014
>
9.1. SR 01-21-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2014 3:34:42 PM
Creation date
1/16/2014 2:37:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/21/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Criteria I Governments I U.S. Public Finance: U.S. Local Governments General Obligation Ratings:Methodology <br /> And Assumptions <br /> Table 2 <br /> Overriding Summary Of • paragraphs 25-35) (cont.) <br /> Available Fund Balance<$500,000 Final rating one notch lower than that suggested <br /> by table 1 <br /> Cap Overrides(rating capped) <br /> Liquidity score equals'4' Final rating capped at'BBB+' <br /> Liquidity score equals'5' Final rating capped at'BB+' <br /> Management score equals'4' Final rating capped at the lower of'A'and one <br /> notch lower than that suggested by table 1 <br /> Management score equals'5' Final rating capped at the lower of'BBB'and two <br /> notches lower than that suggested by table 1 <br /> Management score equals'5'due to a lack of willingness to support unconditional debt Final GO rating on debt not in default capped at'B' <br /> obligations <br /> Available Fund Balance<-10%of general fund expenditures for the most recently reported Final rating capped at'A+' <br /> year or budget flexibility score equals'5' <br /> Available Fund Balance<-5%of general fund expenditures for the two most recently Final rating capped at'A-' <br /> reported years <br /> Available Fund Balance<-5%of general fund expenditures for the three most recently Final rating capped at'BBB' <br /> reported years <br /> Budget performance:For local governments that exhibit characteristics of structural Final rating capped at`BBB+' <br /> imbalance expected to continue and the government does not have a credible plan to restore <br /> balance <br /> *EBI--Effective Buying Income(see glossary) <br /> Factors That Notch From The Indicative Rating <br /> a) Rating adjustments for certain economic measures <br /> 28. When variables measured as part of the overall economic score take on extreme values, adjustments from the <br /> indicative rating occur.When projected per capita Effective Buying Income (EBI) as a percentage of the U.S. projected <br /> per capita EBI exceeds 225%(50%higher than the top income threshold in table 8),the final rating is raised by one <br /> notch to account for the extreme income levels in the tax base.When projected per capita EBI exceeds 300%of the <br /> U.S. level,the final rating is raised by two notches. No similar adjustment applies to Total Market Value(TMV)per <br /> capita because high scores often result from concentrated tax bases.When TMV per capita is less than$30,000, <br /> however,the final rating is lowered by one notch to reflect the limited tax base supporting debt. <br /> b) Sustained large positive fund balances <br /> 29. An abnormally large sustained Available Fund Balance signifies heightened flexibility if projections suggest that it will <br /> endure.Accordingly,the maintenance of an Available General Fund Balance exceeding 75%of general fund <br /> expenditures for the most recently reported year,the current and next year, and that is projected to continue at that <br /> level raises the final rating by one notch. <br /> c) Low nominal fund balances <br /> 30. The Available Fund Balance as a percentage of expenditures measure,used in the budgetary flexibility score, can mask <br /> vulnerability when absolute nominal levels of reserves are low.Accordingly,when the Available General Fund Balance <br /> for the most recently reported year is below$500,000(but above a level that causes a rating cap to occur--see <br /> paragraph 34),the final rating is lowered by one notch to reflect this vulnerability. <br /> WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT SEPTEMBER 12,2013 12 <br /> 1190266 1300881696 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.