My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.3. SR 11-16-1998
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1998
>
11/16/1998
>
5.3. SR 11-16-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:24 AM
Creation date
2/6/2004 5:20:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/16/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
commuting travel demands of forecasted growth in the corridor. State and regional <br />transportation studies prepared for portions of the corridor have documented that a strategy <br />to simply build additional highway capacity is not a financially feasible solution to <br />congestion. <br /> <br />NEED: The Lack of Multimodal Transportation Choices <br /> <br />.An effective, long-term, coordinated response to congestion will require a commitment by <br />affected governmental units to implement strategies that provide alternative modes of travel <br />such as bus, commuter rail, LRT, etc., while encouraging behavioral and land use changes <br />which will result in fewer vehicle trips, and strategies which better utilize the existing <br />capacity of the corridor transportation system. <br /> <br />NEED: The Lack of Coordination Between Transportation Investments and Land Use <br />Development <br /> <br />At present there is no system in place to address corridor-wide changing land use and <br />transportation conditions. The two ends of the corridor have separate transportation <br />planning and land use planning jurisdictions, while the center of the corridor is part of <br />neither. But the rural center is growing and changing as development and settlement pattems <br />spread from both ends. There is a lack of transportation related land use strategies to <br />address the challenge posed by the diversity of urban, suburban and rural/exurban <br />community types found within the corridor. Land use development patterns do not provide <br />for more compact development needed to support transit services and encourage the use of <br />other modes of travel to the single-occupant vehicle. <br /> <br />NEED: High Accident Rate Along the TH 10/47 Corridor <br /> <br />Accident rates in the majority of the corridor are currently higher than the Mn/DOT <br />statewide average for the same type of roadway. Current safety concerns can be expected <br />to worsen without action to address redevelopment, roadway/railroad grade crossings, the <br />high percentage of truck traffic, and access management for TH 10/47. <br /> <br />NEED: Increase Mobility on TH 10/47 <br /> <br />TH 10 is a Principal Arterial. The purpose of a Principal Arterial is to provide a high level <br />of mobility. Many segments of TH 10 have frequently-spaced signalized intersections and <br />access driveways. This situation conflicts with the mobility function of a Principal Arterial. <br /> <br />NEED: The Lack of a Corridor-Wide Transit Services <br /> <br />Currently there is not any corridor-wide transit service between the Twin Cities and St. <br />Cloud metropolitan areas. This limits options for travel in general in the corridor, and <br />limits options to reduce vehicular travel on TH 10 during congested periods. It also limits <br />options for travel to major destinations including the downtowns, universities, MSP airport <br />and the Mall of America, areas which could effectively be served by high-quality transit. <br /> <br />Northstar Corridor Major Investment Study <br />Section 5 - Need for Transportation Improvements <br />10-28-98 <br /> <br />5-2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.