Laserfiche WebLink
Elk River <br /> Municipal Utilities UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING <br /> TO: FROM: <br /> Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Troy Adams, P.E. —General Manager <br /> John Dietz—Chair <br /> Al Nadeau—Vice Chair <br /> Daryl Thompson—Trustee <br /> MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: <br /> December 17, 2013 2.4 <br /> SUBJECT: <br /> CAPX Brookings Project Allocation Increase <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> In May 2006, the Utilities Commission authorized ERMU joining Midwest Municipal <br /> Transmission Group (MMTG) to explore the potential to obtain ownership in the regional <br /> transmission system. This action represented ERMU's decision to investigate a change in <br /> direction towards ownership instead of renting. Ownership in the transmission system <br /> essentially works as a hedge to mitigate volatility in transmission costs. <br /> This is a unique type of investment opportunity for a municipal utility. Because of a municipal's <br /> ability to finance with tax exempt bonds, our cost of money is less than investor owned and <br /> cooperative utilities. With the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approval of a <br /> hypothetical capital structure and a guaranteed rate of return on investment, transmission <br /> ownership becomes an incredible advantage for municipal utilities to position themselves with <br /> very competitive rates compared to the investor owned and cooperative utilities. At the time of <br /> initial research into transmission ownership back in 2007, ERMU could invest in approximately <br /> $21,000,000 of transmission, be completely hedged against volatility in transmission costs, and <br /> still fall under the levels where the bonds would be tax exempt. This amount changes with <br /> ERMU's demand and energy usage. <br /> In February 2007, ERMU entered into an agreement to participate through Central Minnesota <br /> Municipal Power Agency(CMMPA) in the CAPX2020 Brookings-Twin Cities Transmission <br /> Project. Initially the municipals were looking into independently funding their share of the <br /> project. Because of the number of utilities involved, CMMPA chose to act as the bonding agent <br /> for all the municipal utilities investing in this project through them. Even though CMMPA was <br /> the bonding agent, their bond counsel requested resolutions and certifications from all <br /> commissions and councils. And in March 201 1, the Commission and Council both approved <br /> resolutions authorizing the Utilities' participation in the project for an amount not to exceed <br /> $7,140,953. <br /> ate; IPOUteto STI <br /> Page 1 of 3 NATURE <br /> Power olbl�bdler POWERED T o SERVE <br /> 40 <br />