Laserfiche WebLink
0/./417// V cc <br /> • <br /> Tiller Corporation <br /> and its affiliated companies <br /> TILLER Barton Sand&Gravel Co. <br /> CORPORATION" Commercial Asphalt Co. <br /> Barton Enterprises,Inc. <br /> Corporate Office: Barton Industrial Sands,LLC <br /> P.O.Box 1480 <br /> 7200 Hemlock Lane,Suite 200 General: (763)425-4191 <br /> Maple Grove,Minnesota 55311-6840 Facsimile: (763)425-7153 <br /> Web: www.tillercorp.com <br /> January 10,2014 <br /> Chris Leeseberg <br /> Park Planner/Planner <br /> City of Elk River <br /> 13065 Orono Parkway <br /> Elk River,MN 55330 <br /> Re: Response to review by Landmark Environmental,LLC for Conditional Use Permit <br /> Amendment Request,November 2013 <br /> Dear Mr.Leeseberg, <br /> This Letter is in response to the review conducted by Landmark Environmental,LLC's(Landmark) <br /> of our Conditional Use Permit(CUP), CU 97-19 Amendment Request. Landmark submitted a letter <br /> to the City of Elk River dated December 17,2013 that summarized their review and subsequently <br /> resulted in comments requesting some additional information.In this letter, the comments from <br /> Landmark are reiterated, followed by our response,in effort to bring additional clarity or to expand <br /> upon previously submitted information included in the CUP application. <br /> The technical standard of the Mineral Excavation ordinance is identified with the bold print, followed <br /> by the comment from Landmark italic with Tiller's response to the comment following last. <br /> Sec. 42-52 Application <br /> Item: <br /> (7)d.The depth of water tables throughout the proposed extraction site. <br /> Comment: <br /> The information is provided on page 4 and Figure 6 of the application. The groundwater flow <br /> interpretation is not sufficiently documented and, in the northern parcel, is in conflict with <br /> Figure 3 of the "Sampling and Analysis Plan"Elk River Landfill, January 2011. In the Plan, <br /> the groundwater table elevation is shown at 954 near the intersection of 221st Street and Hairy <br /> 169 while Figure 6 shows this elevation at 945. A groundwater divide, as described on page 4 <br /> of the application, is not consistent with the area (Elk River Landfall) and regional <br /> groundwater flow interpretations. Without additional information from onsite wells for the <br />