Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes <br />October 19, 1998 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />4.10. <br /> <br />6.1. <br /> <br />6.2. <br /> <br />Consider EVP Opticon System <br /> <br />City Engineer Terry Maurer indicated that the city has received approval from <br />MnDOT to proceed with the bidding process for the EVP Opticon System. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-114 APPROVING <br />THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS IN <br />THE MATTER OF THE EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION/LED SIGNAL INDICATORS <br />IMPROVEMENT OF 1998. COUNCILMEMBER FARBER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE <br />MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />Open Mike <br /> <br />No one appeared for open mike. <br /> <br />Request by Robert & Joyce Danforth for Easement Vacation, Public Hearinq Cas~. <br />No. EV 98-7 <br /> <br />Planning Assistant Scott Harlicker indicated that Robert and Joyce Danforth have <br />made application for the vacation of a roadway easement on Lot 11 and a <br />portion of Lot 12, Block 2 in Palmer's 1st Addition. Scott Harlicker reviewed the staff <br />report on this issue. <br /> <br />Mayor Duitsman opened the public hearing. There being no one for or against <br />the matter, Mayor Duitsman closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-115, CASE NO. EV 98-7, <br />FOR VACATING A ROADWAY EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTH 17 FEET OF LOT 11, <br />BLOCK 2 PALMERS IsT ADDITION AND THAT PART OF LOT 12, BLOCK 2, PALMER'S <br />FIRST ADDITION WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: <br /> <br />THAT THERE ARE NO BURIED UTILITIES WITHIN THE ROADWAY EASEMENT BEING <br />VACATED. <br /> <br />2. THAT THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT REMAIN IN PLACE. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER FARBER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />Request by Applebee's for Variance to Si.qn Ordinance, Public Hearin.q Case No. <br />V 98-9 <br /> <br />Planning Assistant Scott Harlicker indicated that Applebee's has made <br />application for a variance to the sign ordinance. The applicant is requesting to <br />add one additional wall sign located on the rear of the building facing Highway <br />169. The applicant claims that the hardship is due to lack of visibility from <br />Highway 169 when traveling south. Scott Hariicker indicated that the Board of <br />Adjustments voted to deny the request because the applicant did not meet the <br />criteria for granting a variance. <br /> <br />Mayor Duitsman opened the public hearing. <br /> <br /> <br />