My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1 EDSR 12-16-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2013
>
12-16-2013
>
6.1 EDSR 12-16-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2013 9:17:35 AM
Creation date
12/13/2013 9:17:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
12/16/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River EDA Finance Committee <br /> Decembe 3,2013 <br /> Page Two <br /> 7. Participation Certificate and Agreement between First National Bank of Elk River and the <br /> Elk River EDA wherein Elk River EDA agreed to advance 100% of the Loan to the <br /> Borrower. <br /> In addition I reviewed various emails and letters relating to this matter between the First <br /> National Bank of Elk River and the Elk River EDA. <br /> You have asked me to discuss the possibility of the Elk River EDA collecting the amount owed by <br /> the Borrower and/or the Guarantors under the Note and the Guaranties,respectively. Based upon <br /> my review of the foregoing documents,the first action that the Elk River EDA should take is to <br /> determine if the Borrower and/or the respective Guarantors have any assets that could be attached <br /> and sold in order to collect the amount of any judgment that the Elk River EDA might obtain <br /> against the Borrower and/or the Guarantors in the event they should start a lawsuit under the terms <br /> of the Note and Guaranties. At this time the only method of determining what assets of the <br /> Borrower and/or the Guarantors might be available would be to review all financial statements <br /> provided by the Borrower and the Guarantors to the Elk River Bank;unfortunately,these financial <br /> statements are probably very old and if some of the memos in the file are accurate,then the actual <br /> • financial statements provided to the Elk River Bank were not in and of themselves accurate and, <br /> therefore. it would be very hard to determine if there are any assets that could be used to satisfy <br /> any judgment obtained by the Elk River EDA. <br /> If the Elk River EDA determines that the Borrower and/or the Guarantors have assets that could be <br /> used to satisfy any judgment against them or decides that notwithstanding the inability to <br /> determine whether or not there are any assets of the Borrower and/or the Guarantors to collect <br /> under any judgment,and that they still want to pursue a judgment against the Borrower and/or the <br /> Guarantors,they should have the Elk River Bank assign the Note,Mortgage, Security Agreement <br /> and Guaranties to them. Although the Note is secured by the Mortgage, it appears from the <br /> various documents that there are several Mortgages ahead of the Elk River EDA Mortgage and <br /> therefore it appears that there is not any equity in the property covered by the Mortgage and it <br /> would not be cost effective to foreclose the Mortgage. <br /> The cost to the EDA to pursue collection under the terms of the Note and various Guaranties <br /> would be approximately as follows: <br /> 1. Drafting of the Summons and Complaint,$750. <br /> 2. Service of Process on the Borrower and the Guarantors,approximately$200. <br /> 3. Filing fees with the County, approximately$322. <br /> 173697v2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.